Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNjukwe, E.
dc.contributor.authorOuma, Emily A.
dc.contributor.authorAsten, Piet J.A. van
dc.contributor.authorMuchunguzi, P.
dc.contributor.authorAmah, D.
dc.identifier.citationNjukwe, E., Ouma, E., van Asten, P.J.A., Muchunguzi, P. & Amah, D. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for macropropagation technology for Musa spp. among smallholder farmers and small-and medium-scale enterprises. In G. Blomme, P. van Asten and B. Vanlauwe, Banana systems in the humid highlands of sub-Saharan Africa: enhancing resilience and productivity, (p. 66-71). CABI.
dc.description.abstractLack or shortage of healthy and improved planting material is a major constraint to the expansion of banana and plantain production. The situation is made worse by the lack of formal systems for producing and distributing quality planting material, thereby forcing farmers to depend on natural regeneration of plants for their supply. This is usually a very slow process, and produces small amounts of planting material that are likely to be contaminated with soil-borne pathogens such as nematodes. To overcome this constraint, several techniques have been developed to rapidly multiply banana and plantain planting material, including micropropagation under aseptic conditions in the laboratory. While micropropagation techniques can provide large amounts of planting material, they are not adapted to the conditions of smallholder farmers. Therefore, user~friendly techniques that require little technical skill or equipment would prove more attractive to adoption by such farmers. The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (UTA) has been looking at alternative means of producing planting material for wide~scale distribution of improved banana and plantain cultivars. The alternative methods are classified into two categories: field techniques based on complete or partial decapitation of suckers; and the macropropagation of suckers practised away from the field. Treatment of suckers to reduce the risks of transmitting soil-borne contaminants is strongly recommended and forms an integral component of the dissemination package for smallholder farmers. Macropropagation techniques, although genotype dependent, can produce 8-15 new plants/corm within 15 days, while secondary scarification of newly emerging buds has the potential to further increase the number of plantlets by a factor of 2-3, within the same time frame. Plantlets obtained through this method have the uniformity of micropropagated seedlings while being less prone to post-establishment factors in the field. This method is simple and cheap, although it requires some minimum investment to set up propagators and weaning facilities, so it is suitable for small- and medium-scale enterprises. However, its utilization is undermined by several factors, the most critical of which are lack of initial capital investment and technical skills.
dc.publisherCentre for Agriculture and Biosciences International
dc.subjectTechnology Transfer
dc.subjectTissue Culture
dc.subjectPlanting Material
dc.subjectMacropropagation Technology
dc.subjectSmall-And Medium-Scale Enterprises
dc.titleChallenges and opportunities for macropropagation technology for Musa spp. among smallholder farmers and small-and medium-scale enterprises
dc.typeBook Chapter
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpClimate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
cg.contributor.crpIntegrated Systems for the Humid Tropics
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananas
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.coverage.regionCentral Africa
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centre
cg.iitasubjectSmallholder Farmers
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record