Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoyo, C.C.
dc.contributor.authorJumbo, S.
dc.contributor.authorMahungu, N.M.
dc.contributor.authorBenesi, I.R.M.
dc.contributor.authorNtawuruhunga, Pheneas
dc.contributor.authorSandifolo, V.S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:07:56Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:07:56Z
dc.date.issued2012-02
dc.identifier.citationMoyo, C.C., Jumbo, S., Mahungu, N.M., Benesi, I.R.M., Ntawuruhungu, P. & Sandifolo, V.S. (2012). Evaluation of commercially available herbicides for weed control in cassava. In: Proceedings of the 11th triennial Symposium of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences held at Memling Hotel: Tropical roots and tuber crops and the challenges of globalization and climate changes, (pp.269-275), Kinshasa, 4-8 October. Ibadan: ISTRC-AB.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/1659
dc.description.abstractA trial was conducted in 2008/09 at Chitedze (31o 59' S; 33o 38' E) and Chitala (13o 40' S; 34o 15' E) Research stations in Malawi to evaluate commercially available pre-emergent herbicides for weed control in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Four herbicides, Bullet (chloroacetanilide, dimethanamid, triazine), Harness 90 EC (chloroacetanilide), Codal Gold 412-5 EC (prometryn and S-metolachlor) and Metalachlor 960 EC (S-metolachlor; acetamide), were evaluated with and without follow up hand-hoe weeding (check). Panicum maximum, Elusine indica, Rottboellia chochinchinensis and Setaria pumila were the common narrow-leaved weeds while Commelina benghalensis, Bidens pilosa, Nicandra physalodes and Acanthospermum hispidum were the common broad leaved weeds. Herbicide application did not affect crop establishment but significantly (P<0.001) reduced early weed growth by 74.8 to 91.2 % at Chitedze and 53.7 to 97.9 % at Chitala. Bullet was more effective in early weed control (2.8 weeds m-2 at Chitedze and 0.0 weeds m-2 at Chitala) than the other herbicides (38.7 weeds m-2 at Chitedze and 8.8 weeds m-2 at Chitala) and resulted in root yields (12.3 t ha-1 at Chitedze and 18.4 t ha-1 at Chitala) and returns (MK238,844.00 ha-1 at Chitedze and MK360,779.00 ha-1 at Chitala) comparable to or higher than hand weeding (root yield of 10.6 t ha-1 at Chitedze and 16.3 t ha-1 at Chitala and returns of MK2 0 1 , 4 3 8 . 0 0 h a - 1 a t Ch i t e d z e a n d MK310,448.00 ha-1 at Chitala) and other treatments (root yield of 2.2-13.1 t ha-1 at Chitedze and 1.3-23.6 t ha-1 at Chitala and returns of MK44,000.00 to MK249,078 at Chitedze and MK26,000.00 to MK465,100 ha-1 at Chitala), making it a potential alternative to hand hoe weeding in cassava.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Association of Hydrological Sciences
dc.subjectCassava
dc.subjectHerbicides
dc.subjectPlant Growth
dc.subjectMalawi
dc.subjectWeeding Methods
dc.subjectWeed Control
dc.titleEvaluation of commercially available herbicides for weed control in cassava
dc.typeConference Proceedings
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananas
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationChitedze Agricultural Research Station, Malawi
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africa
cg.coverage.countryMalawi
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectCassava
cg.iitasubjectWeeds
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.publicationplaceIbadan, Nigeria
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid82801
cg.targetaudienceScientists


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record