Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGueye, M.
dc.contributor.authorGoergen, Georg E.
dc.contributor.authorNdiaye, S.
dc.contributor.authorAsiedu, E.
dc.contributor.authorWathelet, J.
dc.contributor.authorLognay, G.
dc.contributor.authorSeck, D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:03:53Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:03:53Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationGueye, M., Goergen, G., Ndiaye, S., Asiedu, E., Wathelet, J., Lognay, G. & Seck, D. (2013). Efficiency of traditional maize storage and control methods in rural grain granaries: a case study from Senegal. Tropicultura, 31(2), 39-46.
dc.identifier.issn0771-3312
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/1268
dc.description.abstractMaize storage and pest control method as practiced in traditional clay granaries in the Kédougou region in eastern Senegal were evaluated under rural conditions during two successive years. Three storage modes, i.e. maize cobs, winnowed and non-winnowed maize grains, were tested in seven granaries where the insecticidal plants Hyptis spicigera or H. suaveolens were either incorporated in the store structure or deposited as layers intermittently with maize. At the beginning of the storage period, all granaries were artificially infested with 7 pairs Tribolium castaneum and Sitophilus zeamais. No damage, losses or live insects were observed during 7 months of storage when maize cobs were placed between layers of H. spicigera. Compared with the control, incorporation of insecticidal plants within the granary bottom had no significant effect on the damage and loss level irrespective of the storage mode. Non-winnowed maize always suffered less damage and losses than the winnowed variant. In all granaries depredation, insect abundance and moisture content were highest toward the end of storage period between June and July.
dc.format.extent39-46
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectMaize
dc.subjectGranaries
dc.subjectDamage
dc.subjectLosses
dc.titleEfficiency of traditional maize storage and control methods in rural grain granaries: a case study from Senegal
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpMaize
cg.contributor.affiliationFood Technology Institute, Senegal
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Thiès
cg.contributor.affiliationConseil Ouest et Centre Africain pour la Recherche et le Développement Agricoles
cg.contributor.affiliationWest and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Liège
cg.contributor.affiliationCentre Régional de Recherche en Ecotoxicologie et Sécurité Environnementale, Senegal
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countrySenegal
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectMaize
cg.journalTropicultura
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid78671


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record