Show simple item record

Productivity, profitability and partial nutrient balance in maize-based conventional and organic farming systems in Kenya

dc.contributor.authorAdamtey, Noah
dc.contributor.authorMusyoka, M.W.
dc.contributor.authorZundel, C.
dc.contributor.authorCobo Borrero, Juan G.
dc.contributor.authorKaranja, E.
dc.contributor.authorFiaboe, K.K.M.
dc.contributor.authorMuriuki, A.
dc.contributor.authorMucheru-muna, M
dc.contributor.authorVanlauwe, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorBerset, E.
dc.contributor.authorMessmer, M.M.
dc.contributor.authorGattinger, A.
dc.contributor.authorBhullar, G.S.
dc.contributor.authorCadisch, Georg
dc.contributor.authorFliessbach, A.
dc.contributor.authorMäder, P.
dc.contributor.authorNiggli, U.
dc.contributor.authorFoster, D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:04:11Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:04:11Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-01
dc.identifier.citationAdamtey, N., Musyoka, M.W., Zundel, C., Cobo, J.G., Karanja, E., Fiaboe, K.K.M.,...& Foster, D. (2016). Productivity, profitability and partial nutrient balance in maize-based conventional and organic farming systems in Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 235, 61-67.
dc.identifier.issn0167-8809
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/1362
dc.descriptionArticle Purchased
dc.description.abstractIn 2007 two long-term trials were established in Kenya to contribute research-based evidence to the global debate on the productivity, economic viability and sustainability of different agricultural production systems. These trials compare conventional (Conv) and organic (Org) farming systems at high and low input levels at two locations, i.e. Chuka, with Humic Nitisols, high inherent soil fertility and rainfall, and Thika, with Rhodic Nitisols with low soil fertility and rainfall. The high input systems (High) represent commercial-scale, export-oriented production that uses the recommended amounts of fertilisers, pesticides and irrigation water to generate high yields, whilst the low input systems (Low) represent local smallholder practices, using relatively few fertilisers and pesticides and operating under rain-fed conditions. The conventional systems received synthetic fertilisers and organic manure, whilst the organic systems only received organic inputs. The trials so far have consisted of a 6-season, 3-year, crop rotation with maize (Zea mays L.) planted in the long rainy seasons (March-September), and vegetables in the short rainy seasons (October – February). Generally, there were no significant differences in the dry matter yields and nutrient uptake by maize, baby corn or beans between the conventional and organic systems at either site. Similar maize grain and baby corn yields were also obtained at Chuka. However, at Thika, maize grain yields in Org-High in 2007 (at conversion) were lower than the yields in Conv-High, but the yields became similar in 2010 (after conversion). At the same site the yields of maize grain under sole cropping in Org-Low were 3.2 times lower than the yields in Conv-Low in 2007 and 1.7 times lower in 2010. When intercropped with beans the yields of the two systems were similar. In the first two years profits from Conv-High were 0.5–1.8 times and 0.2–2.4 times higher than in Org-High when selling the produce at local (Chuka and Thika) and regional markets (Nairobi), but thereafter the profit from the two was similar, even when organic produce was sold at regular market prices. From the fifth year onwards Org-High attracted a price premium of 20 to 50% and this made it 1.3 to 4.1 times more profitable than Conv-High when selling on local and regional markets (in Chuka, Thika and Nairobi). Compared to Conv-High, partial N and K balances at the two sites were positive and higher in Org-High, except for N at Chuka. Our findings demonstrate that Org-High is productive, economically viable, resource-conserving and can contribute to sustainable agriculture production in Kenya depending on regional conditions and the crops cultivated.
dc.description.sponsorshipBiovision Foundation
dc.description.sponsorshipLiechtenstein Development Service
dc.description.sponsorshipSwiss Agency for Development and Cooperation
dc.format.extent61-67
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectFarming Systems
dc.subjectYields
dc.subjectMaize
dc.subjectOrganic Manure
dc.subjectInputs
dc.subjectNutrient Balance
dc.titleProductivity, profitability and partial nutrient balance in maize-based conventional and organic farming systems in Kenya
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpMaize
cg.contributor.affiliationResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture, Switzerland
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology
cg.contributor.affiliationSwiss Federal Office for Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationKenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization
cg.contributor.affiliationKenyatta University
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversität Hohenheim
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.countryKenya
cg.identifier.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.001
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectFarming Systems
cg.iitasubjectMaize
cg.journalAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
local.dspaceid79465
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.001


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
U16ArtAdamteyProductivityIntho ...
Size:
3.429Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record