Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNwadili, C.O.
dc.contributor.authorAugusto, J.
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharjee, R.
dc.contributor.authorAtehnkeng, J.
dc.contributor.authorLópez Montes, A.
dc.contributor.authorOnyeka, T.J.
dc.contributor.authorKumar, P.L.
dc.contributor.authorAsiedu, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, Ranajit
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:04:26Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:04:26Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationNwadili, C.O., Augusto, J., Bhattacharjee, R., Atehnkeng, J., Lopez-Montes, A., Onyeka, T.J., ... & Bandyopadhyay, R. (2016). Comparative reliability of screening parameters for anthracnose resistance in water yam (Dioscorea alata). Plant Disease.
dc.identifier.issn0191-2917
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/1429
dc.descriptionPublished online: 25 Oct. 2016
dc.description.abstractAnthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, is one of the major constraints limiting water yam (Dioscorea alata) production in the tropics. In this region, yam anthracnose control is mostly achieved by the deployment of moderately resistant yam genotypes. Therefore, screening for new sources of anthracnose resistance is an important aspect of yam research in the tropics. The reliability and applicability of different yam anthracnose rating parameters has not been fully examined. Disease severity on detached leaves in the laboratory and leaf severity, lesion size, and spore production on whole plants in the greenhouse were used to screen an F1 yam population and correlate screening results with field evaluations. Anthracnose lesion size had the smallest predicted residual means but whole-plant severity and detached-leaf severity had the best variance homogeneity and relatively small predicted residual means. The concordance correlation coefficient (rc) and κ statistic were used to determine the agreement between anthracnose rating parameters and field evaluations. Detached-leaf (rc = 0.95, κ = 0.81) and whole-plant (rc = 0.96, κ = 0.86) evaluations had high positive agreement with field evaluation but spore production (κ = 0.69) and lesion size (κ = 0.57) had moderate positive agreement. These results suggest that all the evaluated rating parameters can be used to successfully screen yam germplasm for anthracnose resistance but lesion size and spore production data may need to be transformed.
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States Agency for International Development
dc.format.extent1-8
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectColletetrichum Gloeosporioides
dc.subjectDioscorea Alata
dc.subjectYams
dc.subjectAnthracnosis
dc.subjectGreenhouses
dc.subjectGenotypes
dc.subjectDisease Management
dc.titleComparative reliability of screening parameters for anthracnose resistance in water yam (Dioscorea alata)
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananas
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationNational Root Crops Research Institute, Nigeria
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countryBenin
cg.coverage.countryCote D'Ivoire
cg.coverage.countryGhana
cg.coverage.countryNigeria
cg.coverage.countryTogo
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectDisease Control
cg.iitasubjectPlant Diseases
cg.iitasubjectYam
cg.journalPlant Disease
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid79580
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-16-0924-RE


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record