Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeuel, S.
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez, M.
dc.contributor.authorAmler, E.
dc.contributor.authorBehn, K.
dc.contributor.authorKotze, D.
dc.contributor.authorKreye, C.
dc.contributor.authorLeemhuis, C.
dc.contributor.authorWagner, K.
dc.contributor.authorWilly, D.K.
dc.contributor.authorZiegler, S.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:04:28Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:04:28Z
dc.date.issued2016-08
dc.identifier.citationBeuel, S., Alvarez, M., Amler, E., Behn, K., Kotze, D., Kreye, C., ... & Becker, M. (2016). A rapid assessment of anthropogenic disturbances in East African wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 67, 684-692.
dc.identifier.issn1470-160X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/1436
dc.descriptionPublished online: 25 April 2016
dc.description.abstractThe use of East African freshwater wetlands for agriculture has increased in recent decades, raising concerns about potential impacts on wetlands and the long-term sustainability of such land use trends. WET-health is an indicator-based rapid wetland assessment approach developed in South Africa. It allows determining the conditions of wetlands in four assessment modules (hydrology, geomorphology, vegetation, and water quality) by observing the degree of deviation of a wetland from its anticipated natural reference state. We tested the transferability of the WET-health concept for East African inland valley swamps and floodplain wetlands based on 114 assessment units at four study sites. Due to large wetland areas and different environmental settings in East Africa, we modified the original approach using a random selection of assessment units and an assessment scheme based on disturbance types (Appendices A and B). Estimated WET-health impact scores were matched with biophysical and socioeconomic variables using a generalized linear mixed model. Land use included largely undisturbed wetland units occurring side by side with seasonally cropped or grazed units, and drained, permanently cultivated units. A strong differentiation of impact scores between the four assessment modules was apparent with highest scores for vegetation and lowest scores for geomorphology. Vegetation and water quality responded most sensitively to land use changes. The magnitude of wetland disturbance is predominantly determined by management factors such as land use intensity, soil tillage, drainage intensity, and the application of agrochemicals and influences vegetation attributes and the provision of ecosystem services. The proposed modification of WET-health enables users to assess large wetland areas during relatively short periods of time. While further studies will be required, WET-health appears to be a promising concept to be applied to wetlands in East Africa and possibly beyond.
dc.format.extent684-692
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectLand Use
dc.subjectClimate Change
dc.subjectFood Production
dc.subjectWetlands
dc.subjectAnthropogenic
dc.titleA rapid assessment of anthropogenic disturbances in East African wetlands
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystems
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Bonn
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationJuelich Research Center, Germany
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.countryKenya
cg.coverage.countryRwanda
cg.coverage.countryTanzania
cg.coverage.countryUganda
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.journalEcological Indicators
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid79710
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.034


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record