Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBouwmeester, H.J.
dc.contributor.authorHeuvelink, Gerard B.M.
dc.contributor.authorLegg, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorStoorvogel, J.J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:08:27Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:08:27Z
dc.date.issued2012-04
dc.identifier.citationBouwmeester, H., Heuvelink, G.B.M., Legg, J.P. & Stoorvogel, J.J. (2012). Comparison of disease patterns assessed by three independent surveys of cassava mosaic virus disease in Rwanda and Burundi. Plant Pathology, 61(2), 399-412.
dc.identifier.issn0032-0862
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/1828
dc.description.abstractCassava mosaic disease (CMD) seriously affects cassava yields in Africa. This study compared the spatial distribution of CMD using three independent surveys in Rwanda and Burundi. Geostatistical techniques were used to interpolate the pointbased surveys and predict the spatial distributions of different measures of the disease. Correlative relationships were examined for 35 environmental and socio-economic spatial variables of which 31 were correlated to CMD intensity, with the highest correlation coefficients for latitude ()0Æ47), altitude ()0Æ36) and temperature (+0Æ36). The most significant explanatory variables were entered in separate linear regression models for each of the surveys. The models explained 54%, 44% and 22% of the variation in CMD. The residuals of the regression models were interpolated using kriging and added to the regression models to map CMD across both countries. Significant differences were calculated in some areas after correcting for interpolation error. An important explanation of the differences is interaction between the CMD pandemic and the dates of the three surveys. Large relative prediction errors obtained in the regression kriging procedure show the need to improve the survey design and decrease measurement error. Improved maps of crop diseases such as CMD could aid targeting of control interventions and thereby contribute to increasing crop yields. This study validated the unique character of each of the survey approaches adopted and underlines the importance of specific interpretation of results for CMD management. The study emphasizes the need for optimization of sampling designs and survey protocols to maximize the potential of regression kriging.
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States Agency for International Development
dc.format.extent399-412
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectCassava
dc.subjectSpatial Distribution
dc.subjectGis
dc.subjectRegression Kriging
dc.subjectSampling Design
dc.titleComparison of disease patterns assessed by three independent surveys of cassava mosaic virus disease in Rwanda and Burundi
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananas
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationWageningen University and Research Centre
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.countryRwanda
cg.coverage.countryBurundi
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research institute
cg.iitasubjectCassava
cg.iitasubjectPlant Diseases
cg.journalPlant Pathology
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid83280
cg.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02500


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record