Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRonner, E.
dc.contributor.authorDescheemaeker, Katrien
dc.contributor.authorAlmekinders, Conny J.M.
dc.contributor.authorEbanyat, Peter
dc.contributor.authorGiller, Ken E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:11:30Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:11:30Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationRonner, E., Descheemaeker, K., Almekinders, C.J.M., Ebanyat, P. & Giller, K.E. (2018). Farmers’ use and adaptation of improved climbing bean production practices in the highlands of Uganda. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 261, 186-200.
dc.identifier.issn0167-8809
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/2442
dc.descriptionOpen Access Article; Published online: 28 Sept 2017
dc.description.abstractClimbing beans offer potential for sustainable intensification of agriculture, but their cultivation constitutes a relatively complex technology consisting of multiple components or practices. We studied uptake of improved climbing bean production practices (improved variety, input use and management practices) through co-designed demonstrations and farmer-managed adaptation trials with 374 smallholder farmers in eastern and southwestern Uganda. A sub-set of these farmers was monitored one to three seasons after introduction. About 70% of the farmers re-planted climbing beans one season after the adaptation trial, with significant differences between eastern (50%) and southwestern Uganda (80–90%). Only 1% of the farmers used all of the improved practices and 99% adapted the technology. On average, farmers used half of the practices in different combinations, and all farmers used at least one of the practices. Yield variability of the trials was large and on average, trial plots did not yield more than farmers’ own climbing bean plots. Yet, achieved yields did not influence whether farmers continued to cultivate climbing bean in the subsequent season. Uptake of climbing beans varied with household characteristics: poorer farmers cultivated climbing beans more often but used fewer of the best-bet practices; male farmers generally used more practices than female farmers. Planting by poorer farmers resulted in adaptations such as growing climbing beans without fertilizer and with fewer and shorter stakes. Other relationships were often inconsistent and farmers changed practices from season to season. The diversity of farmer responses complicates the development of recommendation domains and warrants the development of a basket of options from which farmers can choose. Our study shows how adoption of technologies consisting of multiple components is a complicated process that is hard to capture through the measurement of an adoption rate at a single point in time.
dc.description.sponsorshipBill & Melinda Gates Foundation
dc.format.extent186-200
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectPhaseolus Vulgaris
dc.subjectLegumes
dc.subjectSmallholders
dc.subjectNitrogen Fixation
dc.subjectClimbing Beans
dc.titleFarmers’ use and adaptation of improved climbing bean production practices in the highlands of Uganda
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpClimate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
cg.contributor.crpGrain Legumes
cg.contributor.affiliationWageningen University and Research Centre
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.countryUganda
cg.creator.identifierKen E Giller: 0000-0002-5998-4652
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research institute
cg.iitasubjectGrain Legumes
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.journalAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
local.dspaceid93020
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.004


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record