Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFermont, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorAsten, Piet J.A. van
dc.contributor.authorTittonell, Pablo A.
dc.contributor.authorWijk, Mark T. van
dc.contributor.authorGiller, Ken E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:11:38Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:11:38Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationFermont, A.M., Van Asten, P.J., Tittonell, P., Van Wijk, M.T. & Giller, K.E. (2009). Closing the cassava yield gap: an analysis from smallholder farms in East Africa. Field Crops Research, 112(1), 24-36.
dc.identifier.issn0378-4290
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/2471
dc.description.abstractCassava yields in Africa are small and it remains unclear which factors most limit yields. Using a series of farm surveys and on-farm and on-station trials in Uganda and western Kenya, we evaluated the importance of abiotic, biotic and associated crop management constraints for cassava production in a range of socio-economic settings as found in smallholder farms in the region. Average yields under farmer management were 8.6 t ha−1, but these were more than doubled to 20.8 t ha−1 by using improved crop establishment, improved genotypes and 100–22–83 kg ha−1 of single-nutrient N–P–K fertilizers. A farm survey revealed large yield differences between farms. Less endowed farmers harvested less cassava per unit area than better endowed farmers (difference of 5.9 and 9.7 t ha−1 in Kenya and Uganda, respectively); differences were associated with less access to labour, poorer soils, and premature harvesting by less endowed farmers. Analysis of 99 on-farm and 6 on-station trials showed that constraints for cassava production varied strongly between sites and years. Poor soil fertility, early water stress and sub-optimal weed management limited cassava production by 6.7, 5.4 and 5.0 t ha−1, respectively, when improved crop establishment and genotypes were used. Pests and diseases were relatively unimportant, while weed management was particularly important in farmer fields during a dry year in Kenya (yield gap of 11.6 t ha−1). The use of complementary analytical tools such as multiple regression and boundary line analysis revealed that many fields were affected by multiple and interacting production constraints. These should be addressed simultaneously if significant productivity improvements are to be achieved. This will be more difficult for less endowed than for better endowed farm households, since the former lack social and financial capital to improve management.
dc.format.extent24-36
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectBoundary Line Analysis
dc.subjectDrought
dc.subjectNutrient Management
dc.subjectProduction Constraints
dc.subjectSoil Fertility
dc.subjectWeed Management
dc.subjectAgro-Ecological
dc.subjectCassava Production
dc.subjectSocio-Economic
dc.titleClosing the cassava yield gap: an analysis from smallholder farms in East Africa
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationWageningen University and Research Centre
cg.contributor.affiliationCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
cg.coverage.regionAcp
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEurope
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.countryUganda
cg.coverage.countryNetherlands
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research institute
cg.iitasubjectCassava
cg.iitasubjectFarm Management
cg.iitasubjectFarming Systems
cg.iitasubjectValue Chains
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.iitasubjectResearch Method
cg.iitasubjectSmallholder Farmers
cg.journalField Crops Research
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid93222
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.01.009


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record