• Contact Us
    • Send Feedback
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    Whole Repository
    CollectionsIssue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject
    This Sub-collection
    Issue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject

    My Account

    Login

    Welcome to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Research Repository

    What would you like to view today?

    Methodological considerations on banana (Musa spp.) yield determinations

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    S10ArtHauserMethodologicalNothomNodev.pdf (574.5Kb)
    Date
    2010
    Author
    Hauser, S.
    Asten, Piet J.A. van
    Type
    Journal Article
    Target Audience
    Scientists
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Description
    Farmers, researchers, extension officers and policy makers need reliable yield data on banana (Musa spp.) to make informed decisions. There are no standard yield determination methods available for Musa research. Production patterns and types vary distinctly in time and space. This requires special attention when expressing yields as unit mass per unit area per unit time (t ha-1 y-1). Determining banana yield is challenging because: (a) bunch yields are often expressed as fresh weight, but edible dry matter percentage can vary strongly between cultivars and environments; and (b) bunch yields often include the peduncle for which often no uniform cutoff point is used. To obtain realistic and valid yield data and to compare Musa yields with those of other crops, the edible dry matter content needs to be determined and considered. In addition, many cultivars have a highly variable rate of plants reaching flowering and bunch production. Too often, yield calculations are made with the assumption that 100% of the plants produce, whereas in many fields up to 70% of the plants do not produce, especially in lowland plantain fields. Plant densities in farmer fields are often highly variable, which requires careful consideration of (a) the definition of a banana plot; (b) the size of the banana plot; and (c) the number of plants in a banana plot. Often, banana clusters consist of several mats of the same generation, leading to underestimations of the number of mats per unit area. We propose that the definition of a single banana mat is a family of plants with interconnected living corms. Crop cycle duration varies strongly as a function of cultivar, altitude, soil fertility, drought stress, and pest and disease infestation. It can vary from less than one year to over two years, leading to large (>50%) yield differences per unit time between and within cultivars. This paper describes the sources of errors and proposes measures to avoid incorrect or incomplete yield determinations.
    Permanent link to this item
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/2629
    IITA Subjects
    Cassava; Maize; Crop Systems; Farm Management
    Agrovoc Terms
    East African Highlands; Crop Cycle; Bannana; Cassava; Yield; Maize; Farmers
    Regions
    Africa; East Africa; West And Central Africa
    Countries
    Cameroon; Ghana; Uganda
    Journals
    Acta Horticulturae
    Collections
    • Journal and Journal Articles4835
    copyright © 2019  IITASpace. All rights reserved.
    IITA | Open Access Repository