Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLawson-Balagbo, L.M.
dc.contributor.authorGondim Jr, M.G.C.
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, G.J. de
dc.contributor.authorHanna, R.
dc.contributor.authorSchausberger, P.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:14:15Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:14:15Z
dc.date.issued2007-09
dc.identifier.citationLawson-Balagbo, L.M., Gondim, M.G.C., De Moraes, G.J., Hanna, R. & Schausberger, P. (2007). Life history of the predatory mites Neoseiulus paspalivorus and Proctolaelaps bickleyi, candidates for biological control of Aceria guerreronis. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 43(1), 49-61.
dc.identifier.issn0168-8162
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/2704
dc.descriptionPublished online: 08 Sept 2007
dc.description.abstractThe eriophyoid mite Aceria guerreronis Keifer (Eriophyidae), commonly called the coconut mite, is a key pest of coconut fruits. Surveys conducted on coconut palms in Brazil revealed the predatory mites Neoseiulus paspalivorus DeLeon (Phytoseiidae) and Proctolaelaps bickleyi Bram (Ascidae) as the most commonly associated natural enemies of A. guerreronis on coconut fruits. However, virtually nothing is known about the life history of these two predators. We conducted laboratory experiments at 25 ± 0.1°C, 70–90% RH and 12:12 h L:D photoperiod to determine the life history characteristics of the two predatory mites when feeding on A. guerreronis and other potential food sources present on coconut fruits such as Steneotarsonemus furcatus DeLeon (Tarsonemidae), coconut pollen and the fungus Rhizopus cf. stolonifer Lind (Mucoraceae). In addition, the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Tetranychidae) was tested for its suitability as prey. Both predators, N. paspalivorus and P. bickleyi, thrived on A. guerreronis as primary food source resulting in shorter developmental time (5.6 and 4.4 days, respectively), higher oviposition rate (1.7 and 7.0 eggs/female/day, respectively) and higher intrinsic rate of increase (0.232 and 0.489 per female/day, respectively) than on any other diet but were unable to develop or lay eggs when fed T. urticae. Coconut pollen and S. furcatus were adequate alternative food sources for N. paspalivorus and Rhizopus for P. bickleyi. We discuss the relevance of our findings for natural and biological control of the coconut mite A. guerreronis.
dc.format.extent49-61
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectCoconut
dc.subjectAceria Guerreronis
dc.subjectBiological Control
dc.subjectPredatory Pests
dc.titleLife history of the predatory mites Neoseiulus paspalivorus and Proctolaelaps bickleyi, candidates for biological control of Aceria guerreronis
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of São Paulo
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria
cg.coverage.regionSouth America
cg.coverage.countryBrazil
cg.creator.identifierRachid Hanna: 0000-0002-5715-0144
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectBiodiversity
cg.iitasubjectPests Of Plants
cg.journalExperimental and Applied Acarology
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid93632
cg.targetaudienceScientists


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record