Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCherry, A.
dc.contributor.authorAbalo, P.
dc.contributor.authorHell, K.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:18:53Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:18:53Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationCherry, A., Abalo, P. & Hell, K. (2005). A laboratory assessment of the potential of different strains of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) to control Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)(Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in stored cowpea. Journal of Stored Products Research, 41(3), 295-309.
dc.identifier.issn0022-474X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/3347
dc.description.abstractTwelve indigenous and exotic isolates of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae were evaluated for their virulence and their ability to suppress populations of Callosobruchus maculatus in stored cowpea. LT50 values ranged from 3.11 to 6.12 days following immersion in aqueous suspensions containing 1×108 conidia ml−1. Indigenous isolates that had been recovered from C. maculatus were more virulent in laboratory bioassays than exotic isolates from other insects. The two isolates with the shortest LT50 values were compared in dose–response assays by immersion and by exposure to cowpea grains treated with dry conidia. In both assays B. bassiana 0362 was consistently more virulent than M. anisopliae 0351. By immersion, LC50 values on day 6 post-treatment were 9.10×104 and 7.10×105 conidia ml−1 for B. bassiana 0362 and M. anisopliae 0351, respectively. Exposure to treated grains gave LC50 values of 1.15×107 and 4.44×107 conidia g−1 grain for B. bassiana 0362 and M. anisopliae 0351, respectively. In 1 kg batches of cowpea stocked with 50 adult C. maculatus, B. bassiana 0362 at both 1×107 and 1×108 conidia g−1 grain led to significant adult mortality and reduced F1 emergence relative to untreated populations. At 1×108 conidia g−1 the effect of the fungus persisted into the F1 generation. The net reproductive rates, R0, measured 26 days after insects were released were 5.16 and 7.32 for the high and low doses compared to 9.52 for the untreated control.
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectCallosobruchus Maculates
dc.subjectBiological Control
dc.subjectBeauveria Bassiana
dc.subjectMetarhizium Anisopliae
dc.subjectCowpeas
dc.titleA laboratory assessment of the potential of different strains of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin and Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) to control Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in stored cowpea
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversité du Bénin
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countryBenin
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectCowpea
cg.iitasubjectPlant Genetic Resources
cg.iitasubjectDisease Control
cg.iitasubjectWeeds
cg.iitasubjectPlant Diseases
cg.iitasubjectPlant Breeding
cg.iitasubjectPests Of Plants
cg.iitasubjectFarming Systems
cg.iitasubjectGenetic Improvement
cg.iitasubjectSmallholder Farmers
cg.iitasubjectLivelihoods
cg.iitasubjectFood Security
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.iitasubjectFarm Management
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid95021
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2004.04.002


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record