Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChikoye, D.
dc.contributor.authorEllis-Jones, J.
dc.contributor.authorAvav, T.
dc.contributor.authorKormawa, P.M.
dc.contributor.authorUdensi, U.E.
dc.contributor.authorTarawali, G.
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, O.K.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:19:40Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:19:40Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationChikoye, D., Ellis-Jones, J., Avav, T., Kormawa, P.M., Udensi, U.E., Tarawali, G. & Nielsen, O.K. (2007). Promoting integrated management practices for speargrass (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch.) in soybean, cassava and yam in Nigeria. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 5(3&4), 202-210.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/3507
dc.description.abstractSpeargrass is a serious weed in many farming systems of West Africa. Participatory research and extension approaches were used to promote farmer testing of alternative speargrass management options in yam, cassava and soybean in Nigeria. Treatments were paired plots with a farmers' control and at least one improved control option. The farmers' practice consisted of slashing, burning and hoe weeding. Improved options were the use of glyphosate either alone or integrated with velvetbean. In the farmers' control, labour use was higher in yam and soybean than in cassava. In all crops, there was a 54 to 96% decrease in labour use as farmers switched from hoe weeding to chemical control. Including velvetbean in the improved management systems required an additional 45 person-hrha. Across all crops, chemical control reduced speargrass density, gave higher yields and gross benefits and had a lower cost of weed control than the farmer's control. Chemical control increased the net benefit over the farmers' control and gave higher benefit:cost ratios because of higher crop values and lower costs of weed control. Farmers preferred chemical control because of better crop performance and reduced labour use. The perceived high cost of herbicides was a disincentive for widespread adoption.
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment for International Development, United Kingdom
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectCover Crop
dc.subjectHerbicide
dc.subjectWeed Contro
dc.subjectParticipatory Approaches
dc.subjectSpeargrass
dc.subjectVelvetbean
dc.subjectChemical Control
dc.subjectFood Security
dc.subjectHerbicides
dc.subjectPoverty
dc.subjectAbiotic And Biotic Stresses
dc.titlePromoting integrated management practices for speargrass (Imperata cylindrica (L) Raeusch.) in soybean, cassava and yam in Nigeria
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationSilsoe Research Institute
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Agiculture, Makurdi
cg.contributor.affiliationAfrica Rice Center
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionAcp
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.regionEurope
cg.coverage.countryNigeria
cg.coverage.countryUnited Kingdom
cg.coverage.countryBenin
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectWeeds
cg.iitasubjectFarm Management
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.iitasubjectPests Of Plants
cg.iitasubjectFood Security
cg.iitasubjectPlant Diseases
cg.iitasubjectHandling, Transport, Storage And Protection Of Agricultural Products
cg.iitasubjectNatural Resource Management
cg.iitasubjectLivelihoods
cg.iitasubjectAgribusiness
cg.iitasubjectPost-Harvesting Technology
cg.iitasubjectDisease Control
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid95478


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record