Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEmechebe, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorEllis-Jones, J.
dc.contributor.authorSchulz, S.
dc.contributor.authorChikoye, D.
dc.contributor.authorDouthwaite, Boru
dc.contributor.authorKureh, I.
dc.contributor.authorTarawali, G.
dc.contributor.authorHussaini, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorKormawa, P.
dc.contributor.authorSanni, A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:23:53Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:23:53Z
dc.date.issued2004-04
dc.identifier.citationEmechebe, A.M., Ellis-Jones, J., Schulz, S., Chikoye, D., Douthwaite, B., Kureh, I., ... & Sanni, A. (2004). Farmer perception of the Striga problem and its control in northern Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture, 40(2), 215-232.
dc.identifier.issn0014-4797
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/4200
dc.description.abstractThe parasitic angiosperms, Striga hermonthica and S. gesnerioides, obligate root parasites endemic in sub-Saharan Africa, constitute severe constraints to cereal and legume production in West and Central Africa. Over the years, a range of effective component technologies has been identified for Striga control in Africa. The potential of these technologies has been demonstrated under researcher-managed conditions. To promote farmer testing of the technologies, community workshops were conducted in 42 rural communities in Kaduna State, northern Nigeria. These revealed that agriculture was the main source of livelihood for most households. The three most important crops, maize, sorghum and pearl millet are attacked by S. hermonthica, regarded as the major constraint to crop production, often causing 70–100% crop loss. Farmers recognised two types of Striga damage (underground and aboveground), with greater damage being caused by underground Striga. Farmers attributed increasing incidence and severity of Striga damage to lack of capital, poor soil fertility, infestation of previously uninfested land by Striga seeds, and continuous cropping of host crops. The most widely used among the 15 existing Striga control techniques identified by the farmers were hoe weeding and hand pulling, application of inorganic fertilizer and manure, crop rotations, fallowing, and early planting. In assessing possible control measures farmers considered increased crop yield, reduced Striga reproduction and Striga emergence, greater crop vigour, and increased soil fertility as positive attributes. Negative attributes comprised increased labour requirement, higher costs, increased risk of crop damage or yield reduction, and lower quantity and quality of produce. Overall, a legume-cereal rotation was the most highly rated control option for S. hermonthica management evaluated by the farmers. The implications of these results are examined with respect to farmers' adoption and adaptation of Striga control options beyond the experimental plots.
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment for International Development, United Kingdom
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectStriga
dc.subjectStriga Hermonthica
dc.subjectWeed Control
dc.subjectTechnology Transfer
dc.subjectFarmers
dc.titleFarmer perception of the Striga problem and its control in northern Nigeria
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpMaize
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationSilsoe Research Institute
cg.contributor.affiliationAhmadu Bello University
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countryNigeria
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectWeeds
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
local.dspaceid99766
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479703001601


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record