Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMutegi, C.
dc.contributor.authorCotty, P.J.
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, Ranajit
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T11:26:31Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T11:26:31Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-17
dc.identifier.citationMutegi, C.K., Cotty, P.J. & Bandyopadhyay, R. (2018). Prevalence and mitigation of aflatoxins in Kenya (1960-to date). World Mycotoxin Journal, 11(3), 341-357.
dc.identifier.issn1875-0710
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/4633
dc.descriptionArticle Purchased
dc.description.abstractAflatoxins are highly toxic metabolites of several Aspergillus species widely distributed throughout the environment. These toxins have adverse effects on humans and livestock at a few micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg) concentrations. Strict regulations on the concentrations of aflatoxins allowed in food and feed exist in many nations in the developing world. Loopholes in implementing regulations result in the consumption of dangerous concentrations of aflatoxins. In Kenya, where ‘farm-to-mouth’ crops become severely contaminated, solutions to the aflatoxins problem are needed. Across the decades, aflatoxins have repeatedly caused loss of human and animal life. A prerequisite to developing viable solutions for managing aflatoxins is understanding the geographical distribution and severity of food and feed contamination, and the impact on lives. This review discusses the scope of the aflatoxins problem and management efforts by various players in Kenya. Economic drivers likely to influence the choice of aflatoxins management options include historical adverse health effects on humans and animals, cost of intervention for mitigation of aflatoxins, knowledge about aflatoxins and their impact, incentives for aflatoxins safe food and intended scope of use of interventions. It also highlights knowledge gaps that can direct future management efforts. These include: sparse documented information on human exposure; few robust tools to accurately measure economic impact in widely unstructured value chains; lack of long-term impact studies on benefits of aflatoxins mitigation; inadequate sampling mechanisms in smallholder farms and grain holding stores/containers; overlooking social learning networks in technology uptake and lack of in-depth studies on an array of aflatoxins control measures followed in households. The review proposes improved linkages between agriculture, nutrition and health sectors to address aflatoxins contamination better. Sustained public awareness at all levels, capacity building and aflatoxins related policies are necessary to support management initiatives.
dc.description.sponsorshipBill & Melinda Gates Foundation
dc.format.extent341-357
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectAflatoxicosis
dc.subjectLiver
dc.subjectCancer
dc.subjectAflatoxins
dc.titlePrevalence and mitigation of aflatoxins in Kenya (1960-to date)
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpAgriculture for Nutrition and Health
cg.contributor.crpMaize
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.countryKenya
cg.creator.identifierCharity Mutegi: 0000-0002-3188-0480
cg.creator.identifierRanajit Bandyopadhyay: 0000-0003-2422-4298
cg.researchthemePLANT PRODUCTION & HEALTH
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centre
cg.iitasubjectPlant Health
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.journalWorld Mycotoxin Journal
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
local.dspaceid101315
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3920/WMJ2018.2362


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record