dc.contributor.author | Adnan, A.A. |
dc.contributor.author | Diels, J. |
dc.contributor.author | Jibrin, J.M. |
dc.contributor.author | Kamara, A. |
dc.contributor.author | Craufurd, Peter Q. |
dc.contributor.author | Shaibu, A.S. |
dc.contributor.author | Mohammed, B. |
dc.contributor.author | Tonnang, Z.E.H. |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-04T11:33:52Z |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-04T11:33:52Z |
dc.date.issued | 2019-02-19 |
dc.identifier.citation | Adnan, A.A., Diels, J., Jibrin, J.M., Kamara, A., Craufurd, P., Shaibu, A.S., ... & Tonnang, Z.E.H. (2019). Options for calibrating ceres-maize genotype specific parameters under data-scarce environments. PLOS ONE, 14(2), 1-20. |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/5833 |
dc.description | Open Access Journal |
dc.description.abstract | Most crop simulation models require the use of Genotype Specific Parameters (GSPs) which provide the Genotype component of G×E×M interactions. Estimation of GSPs is the most difficult aspect of most modelling exercises because it requires expensive and time-consuming field experiments. GSPs could also be estimated using multi-year and multi locational data from breeder evaluation experiments. This research was set up with the following objectives: i) to determine GSPs of 10 newly released maize varieties for the Nigerian Savannas using data from both calibration experiments and by using existing data from breeder varietal evaluation trials; ii) to compare the accuracy of the GSPs generated using experimental and breeder data; and iii) to evaluate CERES-Maize model to simulate grain and tissue nitrogen contents. For experimental evaluation, 8 different experiments were conducted during the rainy and dry seasons of 2016 across the Nigerian Savanna. Breeder evaluation data were also collected for 2 years and 7 locations. The calibrated GSPs were evaluated using data from a 4-year experiment conducted under varying nitrogen rates (0, 60 and 120kg N ha-1). For the model calibration using experimental data, calculated model efficiency (EF) values ranged between 0.88–0.94 and coefficient of determination (d-index) between 0.93–0.98. Calibration of time-series data produced nRMSE below 7% while all prediction deviations were below 10% of the mean. For breeder experiments, EF (0.58–0.88) and d-index (0.56–0.86) ranges were lower. Prediction deviations were below 17% of the means for all measured variables. Model evaluation using both experimental and breeder trials resulted in good agreement (low RMSE, high EF and d-index values) between observed and simulated grain yields, and tissue and grain nitrogen contents. It is concluded that higher calibration accuracy of CERES-Maize model is achieved from detailed experiments. If unavailable, data from breeder experimental trials collected from many locations and planting dates can be used with lower but acceptable accuracy. |
dc.format.extent | 1-20 |
dc.language.iso | en |
dc.rights | CC-BY-4.0 |
dc.subject | Maize |
dc.subject | Leaves |
dc.subject | Stems |
dc.subject | Calibration |
dc.subject | Experiments |
dc.subject | Agricultural Research |
dc.title | Options for calibrating ceres-maize genotype specific parameters under data-scarce environments |
dc.type | Journal Article |
dc.description.version | Peer Review |
cg.contributor.crp | Maize |
cg.contributor.affiliation | Bayero University |
cg.contributor.affiliation | International Institute of Tropical Agriculture |
cg.contributor.affiliation | International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center |
cg.coverage.region | Africa |
cg.coverage.region | West Africa |
cg.coverage.country | Nigeria |
cg.creator.identifier | Alpha Kamara: 0000-0002-1844-2574 |
cg.creator.identifier | Ibrahim Mohammed: 0000-0001-5199-5528 |
cg.researchtheme | NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT |
cg.researchtheme | PLANT PRODUCTION & HEALTH |
cg.isijournal | ISI Journal |
cg.authorship.types | CGIAR and developing country institute |
cg.iitasubject | Maize |
cg.iitasubject | Natural Resource Management |
cg.iitasubject | Plant Health |
cg.iitasubject | Plant Production |
cg.journal | PLOS ONE |
cg.howpublished | Formally Published |
cg.accessibilitystatus | Open Access |
local.dspaceid | 105361 |
cg.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200118 |