Fritters are flour-based snacks made from wheat flour, but a cheaper alternative is needed in a developing economy, such as Zambia, owing to the high cost of wheat. This study aimed at evaluating fritters produced from different sources: fresh cassava roots, high-quality cassava flour (HQCF), and a composite (80:20) of HQCF and high-quality soy flour (HQSF) using 100% wheat flour as the control. The nutritional and anti-nutritional properties were analyzed with standard laboratory methods. A structured questionnaire was used to analyze consumer preferences. There were significant (P < 0.05) differences in the proximate parameters of the fritters samples. In HQCF fritters, amylose increased by 12.26%, sugar by 11.12%, and starch by 27.91%. There were no significant (P > 0.05) differences in the antinutritional properties among cassava and wheat fritters except for the composite cassava‒soybean fritters. Among respondents from Kaoma, Kasama, and Serenje, the sensory characteristics showed no significant (P > 0.05) differences for appearance and aroma of all the fritters samples. The results showed that HQCF fortified with HQSF could be used as a cheaper alternative to wheat flour in the production of nutritious and acceptable fritters.

https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1677129

Multi standard citation

APAHarvardMLAVancouverChicagoIEEE

Alamu Emmanuel Oladejihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-1359

Pheneas Ntawuruhungahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-9070

https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1677129

NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; NUTRITION & HUMAN HEALTH

Cassava; Food Science; Food Security; Food Systems; Grain Legumes; Nutrition; Soybean

Cassava; Flours; Wheats; Food Production; Food Security; Processing; Soybeans

Africa; Southern Africa

Zambia

Cogent Food & Agriculture