Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRakotovao, N.H.
dc.contributor.authorChevallier, T.
dc.contributor.authorChapuis-Lardy, L.
dc.contributor.authorDeffontaines, S.
dc.contributor.authorMathé, S.
dc.contributor.authorRamarofidy, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorRakotoniamonjy, T.H.
dc.contributor.authorLepage, A.
dc.contributor.authorMasso, C.
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, A.
dc.contributor.authorRazafimbelo, T. M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-18T13:01:41Z
dc.date.available2021-02-18T13:01:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRakotovao, N.H., Chevallier, T., Chapuis-Lardy, L., Deffontaines, S., Mathé, S., Ramarofidy, M.A., ... & Razafimbelo, T. M. (2020). Impacts on greenhouse gas balance and rural economy after agroecology development in Itasy Madagascar. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125220: 1-47.
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/7054
dc.description.abstractRural development projects to develop sustainable agriculture need to be assessed before engaging smallholder farmers at large scale. Data on agricultural systems to produce food, provide income for smallholders and reduce greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions are scarce in Sub-Saharan Africa countries. Here, we assessed the potential of agroecological practices (AP) on economic benefits to farmers, GHG balance derived from agricultural activities, and efficiency of economic investments to mitigate GHG. The study was based on a NGO rural development project, which promoted AP: agroforestry, compost, and System of Rice Intensification. The economic and GHG mitigation benefits were projected over a period of 20 years on three scenarios. Two scenarios, differing by two expected levels of AP adoption, were compared to a reference one, in which there was no NGO intervention. Socio-economic, yield and soil data were gathered on 192 farms during five growing seasons (2013–2018). The GHG balance was estimated with TropiC Farm Tool and EX-ACT. The GHG emissions were reduced in both scenarios compared to the reference one: 5.2 to −13.6 tCO2eq farm−1 yr−1 for scenario 1 and 2 respectively. At the regional scale, the projected amount of C saved per euro invested was estimated at −0.25 tCO2eq euro−1 and -0.41 tCO2eq Euro−1 (or € 4 to 2.5 tCO2eq−1) under scenario 1 and scenario 2. The annual cash flow of farmers increased over the 20 years. Our study highlighted the potential of AP for increasing productivity and profitability of smallholder agricultural systems for the Malagasy farmers, while simultaneously contributing to climate change mitigation.
dc.description.sponsorshipBNP Paribas
dc.format.extent1-47
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectFarming Systems
dc.subjectAgroforestry
dc.subjectAgroecology
dc.subjectGreenhouse Gases
dc.subjectRural Development
dc.subjectSmallholders
dc.subjectFarmers
dc.titleImpacts on greenhouse gas balance and rural economy after agroecology development in Itasy Madagascar
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversité d’Antananarivo
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Montpellier
cg.contributor.affiliationAgrisud International, Madagascar
cg.contributor.affiliationCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationUMR Eco&Sols Station Ligne Paradis
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africa
cg.coverage.countryMadagascar
cg.coverage.hubCentral Africa Hub
cg.researchthemeNatural Resource Management
cg.identifier.bibtexciteidRAKOTOVAO:2020
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectAgribusiness
cg.iitasubjectAgronomy
cg.iitasubjectClimate Change
cg.iitasubjectFarming Systems
cg.iitasubjectFood Security
cg.iitasubjectLivelihoods
cg.iitasubjectSmallholder Farmers
cg.iitasubjectSocioeconomy
cg.journalJournal of Cleaner Production
cg.notesPublished online: 19 Nov 2020
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
cg.reviewstatusPeer Review
cg.usagerightslicenseCopyrighted; all rights reserved
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125220
cg.iitaauthor.identifierCargele Masso: 0000-0002-3980-6832
cg.futureupdate.descriptionVolume, Issue No and attachment of corrected PDF
cg.futureupdate.requiredYes
cg.futureupdate.duration3 Months


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record