Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKomarek, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorRahman, N.A.
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, A.
dc.contributor.authorKizito, F.
dc.contributor.authorKoo, J.
dc.contributor.authorAddah, W.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-16T12:05:36Z
dc.date.available2021-07-16T12:05:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationKomarek, A.M., Rahman, N.A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Kizito, F., Koo, J. & Addah, W. (2021). Trade-offs and synergies associated with maize leaf stripping within crop-livestock systems in northern Ghana. Agricultural Systems, 193, 103206: 1-13.
dc.identifier.issn0308-521X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/7181
dc.description.abstractCONTEXT The accessibility and availability of forages is a common concern in crop-livestock systems in West Africa; however, options to increase forage production may entail trade-offs within the farm system that can be challenging to quantify explicitly. OBJECTIVE This study examined how maize (Zea mays L.) leaf stripping affected maize and sheep productivity and associated labour requirements, and farm system trade-offs and synergies in four communities in the Northern Region of Ghana. METHODS Maize leaf stripping involved removing almost senesced leaves from maize plants below the cob level at silking. We combined data from three sources: on-farm maize trials with 28 farmers from two seasons (2017 and 2018), on-farm sheep feeding trials where the pasture-based diets of weaner sheep were supplemented with stripped maize leaves fed in pens (conducted in 2019), and farm survey data from 117 households (conducted in 2014), seven of which were in the on-farm maize trials and owned sheep. We examined the trial data using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Maize leaf stripping had no significant effect on maize grain yield but had a significant positive effect on maize forage protein yield from leaf and stover. Offering maize leaves to weaner sheep had a significant positive effect on average daily liveweight gain, estimated marginal mean was 29.3 g with maize leaves and −10.9 g without maize leaves. For the maize-sheep systems of the seven households, non-inferential statistics suggested that on average maize leaf stripping reduced total maize grain production by 12% (range −46 to 38) and increased maize forage protein production from leaf and stover by 90% (range −16 to 298). Stripping the maize leaves from one hectare of land took an extra 34 h (range 27 to 42) of labour, which was counterbalanced by reduced labour time for grazing as sheep were fed the maize leaves in pens. For the 117 farmers, heterogeneity in maize areas planted and livestock numbers resulted in heterogeneous production and labour effects of maize leaf stripping. Farmers qualitatively described how maize leaf stripping released labour so children could spend more time at school rather than shepherding. SIGNIFICANCE We quantified in northern Ghana how maize leaf stripping altered crop and livestock productivity and associated trade-offs and synergies in the farm system, including labour. Changes in crop management often have implications beyond the crop's field and examining these implications can provide insights into the suitability of alternative farm management options. Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image Download : Download high-res image (97KB)Download : Download full-size image
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch In Sustainable Intensification for the Next Generation
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States Agency for International Development
dc.format.extent1-13
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectGhana
dc.subjectLabour
dc.subjectLeafs
dc.subjectStripping
dc.subjectMaize
dc.subjectSheep
dc.subjectSustainable Intensification
dc.titleTrade-offs and synergies associated with maize leaf stripping within crop-livestock systems in northern Ghana
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Food Policy Research Institute
cg.contributor.affiliationThe University of Queensland
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationAlliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity for Development Studies, Ghana
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countryGhana
cg.coverage.hubHeadquarters and Western Africa Hub
cg.researchthemeSocial Science and Agribusiness
cg.identifier.bibtexciteidKOMAREK:2021
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectAgribusiness
cg.iitasubjectAgronomy
cg.iitasubjectFood Security
cg.iitasubjectMaize
cg.iitasubjectMarkets
cg.iitasubjectPlant Breeding
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.iitasubjectSmallholder Farmers
cg.iitasubjectSocioeconomy
cg.iitasubjectValue Chains
cg.journalAgricultural Systems
cg.notesOpen Access Article; Published online: 09 Jul 2021
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
cg.reviewstatusPeer Review
cg.usagerightslicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 0.0)
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103206
cg.iitaauthor.identifierFred Kizito: 0000-0002-7488-2582
cg.futureupdate.requiredNo
cg.identifier.issue103206
cg.identifier.volume193


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record