Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKallow, S.
dc.contributor.authorPanis, B.
dc.contributor.authorVu, T.D.
dc.contributor.authorVu, D.T.
dc.contributor.authorPaofa, J.
dc.contributor.authorMertens, A.
dc.contributor.authorSwennen, R.
dc.contributor.authorJanssens, S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-06T12:43:27Z
dc.date.available2021-10-06T12:43:27Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationKallow, S., Panis, B., Vu, T.D., Vu, D.T., Paofa, J., Mertens, A., ... & Janssens, S. (2021). Maximizing genetic representation in seed collections from populations of self and cross-pollinated banana wild relatives. BMC Plant Biology, 21, 415: 1-14.
dc.identifier.issn1471-2229
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/7263
dc.description.abstractBackground Conservation of plant genetic resources, including the wild relatives of crops, plays an important and well recognised role in addressing some of the key challenges faced by humanity and the planet including ending hunger and biodiversity loss. However, the genetic diversity and representativeness of ex situ collections, especially that contained in seed collections, is often unknown. This limits meaningful assessments against conservation targets, impairs targeting of future collecting and limits their use. We assessed genetic representation of seed collections compared to source populations for three wild relatives of bananas and plantains. Focal species and sampling regions were Musa acuminata subsp. banksii (Papua New Guinea), M. balbisiana (Viet Nam) and M. maclayi s.l. (Bougainville, Papua New Guinea). We sequenced 445 samples using suites of 16-20 existing and newly developed taxon-specific polymorphic microsatellite markers. Samples of each species were from five populations in a region; 15 leaf samples and 16 seed samples from one infructescence (‘bunch’) for each population. Results Allelic richness of seeds compared to populations was 51%, 81% and 93% (M. acuminata, M. balbisiana and M. maclayi respectively). Seed samples represented all common alleles in populations but omitted some rarer alleles. The number of collections required to achieve the 70% target of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation was species dependent, relating to mating systems. Musa acuminata populations had low heterozygosity and diversity, indicating self-fertilization; many bunches were needed (>15) to represent regional alleles to 70%; over 90% of the alleles from a bunch are included in only two seeds. Musa maclayi was characteristically cross-fertilizing; only three bunches were needed to represent regional alleles; within a bunch, 16 seeds represent alleles. Musa balbisiana, considered cross-fertilized, had low genetic diversity; seeds of four bunches are needed to represent regional alleles; only two seeds represent alleles in a bunch. Conclusions We demonstrate empirical measurement of representation of genetic material in seeds collections in ex situ conservation towards conservation targets. Species mating systems profoundly affected genetic representation in seed collections and therefore should be a primary consideration to maximize genetic representation. Results are applicable to sampling strategies for other wild species.
dc.description.sponsorshipBill & Melinda Gates Foundation
dc.format.extent1-14
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectConservation Agriculture
dc.subjectSampling
dc.subjectCrop Wild Relatives
dc.subjectGene Banks
dc.subjectGenetic Diversity
dc.subjectBananas
dc.titleMaximizing genetic representation in seed collections from populations of self and cross-pollinated banana wild relatives
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananas
cg.contributor.affiliationKatholieke Universiteit, Leuven
cg.contributor.affiliationMeise Botanic Garden
cg.contributor.affiliationRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew
cg.contributor.affiliationBioversity International
cg.contributor.affiliationPlant Resources Center, Vietnam
cg.contributor.affiliationNational Agricultural Research Institute, Papua New Guinea
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.coverage.regionPacific
cg.coverage.countryPapua New Guinea
cg.coverage.hubEastern Africa Hub
cg.researchthemeBiotech and Plant Breeding
cg.identifier.bibtexciteidKALLOW:2021a
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectAgronomy
cg.iitasubjectBanana
cg.iitasubjectBiodiversity
cg.iitasubjectCrop Husbandry
cg.iitasubjectFarming Systems
cg.iitasubjectFood Security
cg.iitasubjectPlant Breeding
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.iitasubjectTissue Culture
cg.journalBMC Plant Biology
cg.notesOpen Access Journal; Published online: 09 Sep 2021
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
cg.reviewstatusPeer Review
cg.usagerightslicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 0.0)
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03142-y
cg.iitaauthor.identifierRony Swennen: 0000-0002-5258-9043
cg.futureupdate.requiredNo
cg.identifier.issue415
cg.identifier.volume21


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record