Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSileshi, G.W.
dc.contributor.authorKihara, J.
dc.contributor.authorTamene, L.D.
dc.contributor.authorVanlauwe, B.
dc.contributor.authorPhiri, E.
dc.contributor.authorJama, B.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T09:18:39Z
dc.date.available2022-04-05T09:18:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationSileshi, G.W., Kihara, J., Tamene, L.D., Vanlauwe, B., Phiri, E. & Jama, B. (2022). Unravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils. Experimental Agriculture, 1-17.
dc.identifier.issn0014-4797
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/7406
dc.description.abstractA number of studies across sub-Saharan Africa have recently reported poor crop responses and low agronomic use efficiencies of applied nitrogen (AEN), phosphorus (AEP) and potassium (AEK). However, the conditions under which non-responsiveness occurs, its underlying causes and its probability of occurrence on different soil types are not well understood. Using data from 542 sites and 14 soil types in 23 African countries, we provide novel insights into the linkage between lack of response to applied N, P and K, the mineralogy of soils and their resilience to erosion. We estimated mean responses as well as the probabilities (ϕ) of no response in terms of response ratio (RR), yield gain (YG) and agronomic efficiency. Here we defined ‘no response’ as zero agronomic response to fertilizer inputs in a given site and year indexed by either RR ≤ 1, AEN ≤ 0, AEP ≤ 0 or AEK ≤ 0. The highest risks of no response were recorded on the iron-rich Plinthosols (ϕ = 0.26) followed by the aluminium-rich Alisols (ϕ = 0.16) and the erosion-prone Lixisols (ϕ = 0.16) and Leptosols (ϕ = 0.13). In terms of yield gains, the highest risk of low response (i.e., YG ≤ 0.5) was recorded on Alisols (ϕ = 0.47) and the lowest on Fluvisols (ϕ = 0.05). Cambisols, Fluvisols, Luvisols and Nitisols were deemed highly responsive to NPK fertilizer. The risks of no response were significantly higher on soils derived from siliceous than mafic parent materials, soil types with low resilience to erosion, soils with low-activity clays and high P fixation capacity. It is concluded that maize grain yields can exceed 3 t ha-1 with high probability (ϕ > 0.80) on Andosols, Nitisols and Vertisols, but with very low probability (ϕ < 0.30) on Alisols and Arenosols. It is also concluded that across soil types and agroecological zones, the risk of no response is up to two times more on farmers’ fields than on research stations. Here, we discuss the implications of these finding for the design and location of future agronomic trials. We also provide insights to guide the targeting of fertilizer subsidies where nutrients can be more efficiently used.
dc.format.extent1-17
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectAlisols
dc.subjectAndosols
dc.subjectCambisols
dc.subjectLuvisols
dc.subjectNitisols
dc.subjectPhaeozems
dc.subjectResilience
dc.subjectFertility
dc.subjectFertilizers
dc.titleUnravelling causes of poor crop response to applied N and P fertilizers on African soils
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.contributor.crpMaize
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananas
cg.contributor.affiliationAddis Ababa University
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zambia
cg.contributor.affiliationIslamic Development Bank
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countryKenya
cg.coverage.countryMalawi
cg.coverage.countryMali
cg.coverage.countryNigeria
cg.coverage.countryTanzania
cg.coverage.hubCentral Africa Hub
cg.researchthemeNatural Resource Management
cg.identifier.bibtexciteidSILESHI:2022
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectAgronomy
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.iitasubjectSoil Fertility
cg.journalExperimental Agriculture
cg.notesOpen Access Article; Published online: 08 Feb 2022
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
cg.reviewstatusPeer Review
cg.usagerightslicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 0.0)
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0014479721000247
cg.iitaauthor.identifierbernard vanlauwe: 0000-0001-6016-6027
cg.futureupdate.requiredNo


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record