Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMignouna, D.B.
dc.contributor.authorAkinola, A.A.
dc.contributor.authorAbdoulaye, T.
dc.contributor.authorAlene, A.D.
dc.contributor.authorManyong, V.
dc.contributor.authorMaroya, N.G.
dc.contributor.authorAighewi, B.A.
dc.contributor.authorKumar, P.L.
dc.contributor.authorBalogun, M.
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Montes, A.
dc.contributor.authorRees, D.
dc.contributor.authorAsiedu, R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-20T09:18:56Z
dc.date.available2022-04-20T09:18:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMignouna, D. B., Akinola, A. A., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A. D., Manyong, V., Maroya, N. G., ... & Asiedu, R. (2020). Potential returns to yam research investment in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond. Outlook on Agriculture, 1-10.
dc.identifier.issn0030-7270
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/7422
dc.description.abstractLack of good-quality planting materials has been identified as the most severe problem militating against increased agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and beyond. However, investment of research efforts and resources in addressing this menace will only be feasible and worthwhile if attendant economic gains are considerable. As a way of investigating the economic viability of yam investment, this research has been initiated to address problems confronting yam productivity in eight countries of SSA and beyond: Nigeria, Ghana, Benin, Togo, Côte d’Ivoire, Papua New Guinea, Jamaica, and Columbia. Research options developed were to be deployed and disseminated. Key technologies include the adaptive yam minisett technique (AYMT), varieties adapted to low soil fertility and drought, nematode-resistant cultivars (NRC), and crop management and postharvest practices (CMPP). This article aims at estimating the potential economic returns, the expected number of beneficiaries, and poverty reduction consequent to the adoption of technology options. Estimates show that the new land area that will be covered by the technologies in the eight countries will range between 770,000 ha and 1,000,000 ha with the highest quota accounted for by AYMT. The net present value will range between US$584 and US$1392 million and was highest for the NRC. The CMPP had the lowest benefit-cost ratio of 7.74. About 1,049,000 people would be moved out of poverty by these technologies by 2037 in the region. These technologies are less responsive to changes in cost than that in adoption rate. Therefore, the realization of the potential economic gains depends on the rate and extent of adoption of these technologies. Giving the knowledge-intensive nature of some of these interventions, capacity building of potential adopters will be critical to increasing the sustainability of the yam sector, thereby enhancing food security and reducing poverty.
dc.description.sponsorshipBill & Melinda Gates Foundation
dc.format.extent1-10
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectEx Ante Impact Assessment
dc.subjectCrops
dc.subjectPoverty
dc.subjectPolicies
dc.subjectWest Africa
dc.titlePotential returns to yam research investment in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.contributor.crpRoots, Tubers and Bananas
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Trade Centre-Yam Development Council
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Greenwich
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countryGhana
cg.coverage.countryNigeria
cg.coverage.hubSouthern Africa Hub
cg.coverage.hubEastern Africa Hub
cg.coverage.hubHeadquarters and Western Africa Hub
cg.researchthemeBiotech and Plant Breeding
cg.researchthemePlant Production and Health
cg.researchthemeSocial Science and Agribusiness
cg.identifier.bibtexciteidMIGNOUNA:2020
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research institute
cg.iitasubjectAgribusiness
cg.iitasubjectAgronomy
cg.iitasubjectFood Security
cg.iitasubjectImpact Assessment
cg.iitasubjectPlant Breeding
cg.iitasubjectPlant Health
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.iitasubjectPolicies and Institutions
cg.iitasubjectSocioeconomy
cg.iitasubjectValue Chains
cg.iitasubjectYam
cg.journalOutlook on Agriculture
cg.notesOpen Access Article; Published online: 24 April 2020
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
cg.reviewstatusPeer Review
cg.usagerightslicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 0.0)
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0030727020918388
cg.iitaauthor.identifierDjana Babatima Mignouna: 0000-0002-4074-2928
cg.iitaauthor.identifierAdebayo Akinola: 0000-0002-8290-9597
cg.iitaauthor.identifierTahirou Abdoulaye: 0000-0002-8072-1363
cg.iitaauthor.identifierArega Alene: 0000-0002-2491-4603
cg.iitaauthor.identifierVictor Manyong: 0000-0003-2477-7132
cg.iitaauthor.identifierNorbert Maroya: 0000-0002-7079-4729
cg.iitaauthor.identifierBeatrice Aighewi: 0000-0002-9398-1674
cg.iitaauthor.identifierP. Lava Kumar: 0000-0003-4388-6510
cg.iitaauthor.identifierMorufat Balogun: 0000-0001-8770-5529
cg.iitaauthor.identifierAntonio Jose Lopez-Montes: 0000-0001-5801-2475
cg.iitaauthor.identifierRobert Asiedu: 0000-0001-8943-2376
cg.futureupdate.requiredNo


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record