Show simple item record

A review of inclusive business models and their application in aquaculture development

dc.contributor.authorKaminski, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorKruijssen, F.
dc.contributor.authorCole, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorBeveridge, M.C.
dc.contributor.authorDawson, C.
dc.contributor.authorMohan, C.V.
dc.contributor.authorSuri, S.
dc.contributor.authorKarim, M.
dc.contributor.authorChen, O.L.
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, M.J.
dc.contributor.authorDowning, W.
dc.contributor.authorWeirowski, F.
dc.contributor.authorGenschick, S.
dc.contributor.authorTran, N.
dc.contributor.authorRogers, W.
dc.contributor.authorLittle, D.C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-25T15:26:36Z
dc.date.available2022-07-25T15:26:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationKaminski, A.M., Kruijssen, F., Cole, S.M., Beveridge, M.C., Dawson, C., Mohan, C.V., ... & Little, D.C. (2020). A review of inclusive business models and their application in aquaculture development. Reviews in Aquaculture, 12(3), 1881-1902.
dc.identifier.issn1753-5123
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/7574
dc.description.abstractFor aquaculture to continue along its current growth trajectory and contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, value chains must become more inclusive. Smallholders and other local value chain actors are often constrained by circumstances and market failures in the global aquaculture industry. Integrating these actors into aquaculture value chains through inclusive business models (IBMs) is often touted as a solution to sustainable and ethical trade and business that can generate development outcomes. We reviewed 36 papers under seven business models commonly used in agriculture development to assess their application in aquaculture value chains in lower‐income countries. A global value chain (GVC) analysis is used to unpack the economic and social upgrading objectives of the different IBMs, as well as the types of relational coordination used between actors in the chain to achieve development outcomes. The extent to which these IBMs helped poor actors overcome certain barriers is evaluated with a focus on how they may ensure or be a risk to inclusiveness through the relations and upgrading opportunities evident in their make‐up. The analysis found that the majority of the models focused on economic upgrading over social upgrading. Providing opportunities for the latter is key to achieving the inclusive objectives of IBMs. Greater horizontal coordination between actors can create further opportunities for economic upgrading established under vertical coordination with other nodes upstream and downstream in a value chain. There is a need to further contextualize these models to aquaculture systems and develop clear indicators of inclusiveness.
dc.description.sponsorshipWorldFish
dc.description.sponsorshipCGIAR
dc.format.extent1881-1902
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectBusiness Management
dc.subjectSmallholders
dc.subjectValue Chain
dc.subjectAcquaculture
dc.subjectDevelopment
dc.titleA review of inclusive business models and their application in aquaculture development
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stirling
cg.contributor.affiliationRoyal Tropical Institute
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationIndependent Consultant, Thailand
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Washington
cg.contributor.affiliationWorldFish
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of British Columbia
cg.contributor.affiliationDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
cg.coverage.hubEastern Africa Hub
cg.researchthemeSocial Science and Agribusiness
cg.identifier.bibtexciteidKAMINSKI:2020
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectAgribusiness
cg.iitasubjectBiodiversity
cg.iitasubjectNatural Resource Management
cg.iitasubjectSocioeconomy
cg.iitasubjectValue Chains
cg.journalReviews in Acquaculture
cg.notesPublished online: 30 Jan 2020
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
cg.reviewstatusPeer Review
cg.usagerightslicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 0.0)
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/raq.12415
cg.iitaauthor.identifierAlexander M. Kaminski: 0000-0001-5148-0460
cg.iitaauthor.identifierFroukje Kruijssen: 0000-0002-9804-3038
cg.iitaauthor.identifierChadag Mohan: 0000-0002-2574-284X
cg.iitaauthor.identifierSharon Suri: 0000-0003-3064-7991
cg.iitaauthor.identifierManjurul Kairm: 0000-0003-4280-3568
cg.iitaauthor.identifierMichael Phillips: 0000-0002-0282-0286
cg.futureupdate.requiredNo
cg.identifier.issue3
cg.identifier.volume12


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
U20ArtKaminskiReviewInthomDev.pdf
Size:
393.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Journal Article
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record