Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRonner, E.
dc.contributor.authorFranke, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorVanlauwe, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorDianda, M.
dc.contributor.authorEdeh, E.
dc.contributor.authorUkem, B.
dc.contributor.authorBala, A.
dc.contributor.authorHeerwaarden, Joost van
dc.contributor.authorGiller, Ken E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T10:57:35Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T10:57:35Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-01
dc.identifier.citationRonner, E., Franke, A.C., Vanlauwe, B., Dianda, M., Edeh, E., Ukem, B., ... & Giller, K.E. (2016). Understanding variability in soybean yield and response to P-fertilizer and rhizobium inoculants on farmers’ fields in northern Nigeria. Field Crops Research, 186, 133-145.
dc.identifier.issn0378-4290
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/785
dc.descriptionAvailable online 16 November 2015
dc.description.abstractSoybean yields could benefit from the use of improved varieties, phosphate-fertilizer and rhizobium inoculants. In this study, we evaluated the results of widespread testing of promiscuous soybean varieties with four treatments: no inputs (control); SSP fertilizer (P); inoculants (I) and SSP plus inoculants (P + I) among smallholder farmers in northern Nigeria in 2011 and 2012. We observed a strong response to both P and I, which significantly increased grain yields by 452 and 447 kg ha−1 respectively. The additive effect of P + I (777 kg ha−1) resulted in the best average yields. Variability in yield among farms was large, which had implications for the benefits for individual farmers. Moreover, although the yield response to P and I was similar, I was more profitable due to its low cost. Only 16% of the variability in control yields could be explained by plant establishment, days to first weeding, percentage sand and soil exchangeable magnesium. Between 42% and 61% of variability in response to P and/or I could be explained by variables including year, farm size, plant establishment, total rainfall and pH. The predictive value of these variables was limited, however, with cross-validation R2 decreasing to about 15% for the prediction between Local Government Areas and 10% between years. Implications for future research include our conclusion that averages of performance of technologies tell little about the adoption potential for individual farmers. We also conclude that a strong agronomic and economic case exists for the use of inoculants with promiscuous soybean, requiring efforts to improve the availability of good quality inoculants in Africa.
dc.format.extent133-145
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectBradyrhizobium
dc.subjectSoybeans
dc.subjectGrain Legumes
dc.subjectSustainable Agriculture
dc.titleUnderstanding variability in soybean yield and response to P-fertilizer and rhizobium inoculants on farmers' fields in northern Nigeria
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpGrain Legumes
cg.contributor.affiliationWageningen University and Research Centre
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of the Free State
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationFederal University of Agriculture, Nigeria
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countryNigeria
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectGrain Legumes
cg.iitasubjectSoybean
cg.journalField Crops Research
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusLimited Access
local.dspaceid74889
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.023


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record