| dc.contributor.author | Tamo, M. |
| dc.contributor.author | Glitho, I.A. |
| dc.contributor.author | Tepa-Yotto, G. |
| dc.contributor.author | Muniappan, R. |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-05T09:55:35Z |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-05T09:55:35Z |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-10 |
| dc.identifier.citation | Tamò, M., Glitho, I., Tepa-Yotto, G. & Muniappan, R. (2022). How does IPM 3.0 look like (and why do we need it in Africa)?. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 53: 100961, 1-8. |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2214-5745 |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/7960 |
| dc.description.abstract | The concept of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) was introduced sixty years ago to curb the overuse of agricultural pesticides, whereby its simplest version (IPM 1.0) was aiming at reducing the frequency of applications. Gradually, agro-ecological principles, such as biological control and habitat management, were included in IPM 2.0. However, throughout this time, smallholder farmers did not improve their decision-making skills and continue to use hazardous pesticides as their first control option. We are therefore proposing a new paradigm — IPM 3.0 — anchored on 3 pillars: 1) real-time farmer access to decision-making, 2) pest-management options relying on science-driven and nature-based approaches, and 3) the integration of genomic approaches, biopesticides, and habitat-management practices. We are convinced that this new paradigm based on technological advances, involvement of youth, gender-responsiveness, and climate resilience will be a game changer. However, this can only become effective through redeployment of public funding and stronger policy support. |
| dc.description.sponsorship | United States Agency for International Development |
| dc.description.sponsorship | World Bank |
| dc.format.extent | 1-8 |
| dc.language.iso | en |
| dc.subject | Integrated Pest Management |
| dc.subject | Biological Control |
| dc.subject | Climate Change |
| dc.subject | Smallholders |
| dc.subject | Pesticides |
| dc.title | How does IPM 3.0 look like (and why do we need it in Africa)? |
| dc.type | Journal Article |
| cg.contributor.crp | Grain Legumes |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | International Institute of Tropical Agriculture |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | Université de Lomé |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | Virginia Tech University |
| cg.coverage.region | Africa |
| cg.coverage.region | West Africa |
| cg.coverage.country | Benin (Dahomey) |
| cg.coverage.country | Burkina Faso (Upper Volta) |
| cg.coverage.country | Ghana |
| cg.coverage.country | Niger |
| cg.coverage.country | Nigeria |
| cg.coverage.hub | Headquarters and Western Africa Hub |
| cg.researchtheme | Plant Production and Health |
| cg.identifier.bibtexciteid | TAMO:2022 |
| cg.isijournal | ISI Journal |
| cg.authorship.types | CGIAR and developing country institute |
| cg.iitasubject | Agronomy |
| cg.iitasubject | Food Security |
| cg.iitasubject | Pests of Plants |
| cg.iitasubject | Plant Breeding |
| cg.iitasubject | Plant Health |
| cg.iitasubject | Smallholder Farmers |
| cg.journal | Current Opinion in Insect Science |
| cg.notes | Published online: 09 Aug 2022 |
| cg.accessibilitystatus | Open Access |
| cg.reviewstatus | Peer Review |
| cg.usagerightslicense | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 0.0) |
| cg.targetaudience | Scientists |
| cg.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2022.100961 |
| cg.iitaauthor.identifier | Manuele Tamò: 0000-0002-5863-7421 |
| cg.iitaauthor.identifier | Ghislain Tepa-Yotto: 0000-0002-9650-8313 |
| cg.futureupdate.required | No |
| cg.identifier.volume | 53 |
