Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBedassa, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorAbebe, A.T.
dc.contributor.authorTolessa, A.R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T07:27:51Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T07:27:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBedassa, T.A., Abebe, A.T. & Tolessa, A.R. (2022). Tolerance to soil acidity of soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes under field conditions Southwestern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE, 17(9):e0272924,1-15.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/7974
dc.description.abstractSoil acidity with associated low nutrient availability is one of the major constraints to soybean production in southwestern Ethiopia. Integrated use of lime and acid-tolerant crops is believed to reduce soil acidity and improve crop production. The experiment was conducted in the field condition of Mettu, southwestern Ethiopia during the 2017/18 main cropping season. The experiment comprised fifteen soybean genotypes and two soil amendment (lime and unlimed) treatments arranged in a split-plot design with three replications. For each treatment, four rows were planted per plot; data related to growth, root, nodule, and yield of the crop were collected at a necessary stage for each. Liming and genotype interaction had significantly (P = 0.01) affected all parameters considered except for hundred seed weight and root volume and were affected only by the main effects of genotypes and liming. A significant reduction for most parameters was found on lime-untreated soil than treated soil. Though some genotypes showed higher performance for root, growth parameters, and yield components under unlimed soils; however, gave higher yield and yield components, when grown on lime-untreated with an average yield reduction of 13.7%, due to soil acidity. The maximum grain yield of (1943.93 kg ha-1) was obtained under lime treated acid soil from PI567046A genotype; while the lowest (510.49 kg ha-1) were recorded from SCS-1genotype under the lime untreated acid soil. Genotype BRS268 showed higher yield (1319.83 kg ha-1) under lime untreated acid soil than lime treated acid soil (1143.47 kg ha-1) and showed less reduction percentage for a number of the nodules, root weight, and number of seeds per plant; while PI567046A showed high reduction percentage for yield, biomass, number of pod and seed per plant. A high difference was observed among the soybean genotypes for soil acidity tolerance, which might be further exploited by breeders for the genetic improvement of soybean. Genotype BRS268 had performed better than other tested genotypes under increased soil acidity. selection would be effective to improve soybean genotypes performance on acid soils and identify low Phosphorus tolerant genotype that helps smallholder farmers optimize soybean productivity on acid soils in the study area. HAWASSA-04 variety is the most tolerant among the tested materials. However, further study is required by considering additional genotypes to reach a conclusive recommendation.
dc.description.sponsorshipEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research
dc.format.extent1-15
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectSoil Physics
dc.subjectSoybeans
dc.subjectCrop Production
dc.subjectGenotypes
dc.subjectEthiopia
dc.titleTolerance to soil acidity of soybean (Glycine max L.) genotypes under field conditions Southwestern Ethiopia
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.contributor.crpGrain Legumes
cg.contributor.affiliationJimma Agricultural Research Center
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationJimma University
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.countryEthiopia
cg.coverage.hubHeadquarters and Western Africa Hub
cg.researchthemeBiotech and Plant Breeding
cg.identifier.bibtexciteidBEDASSA:2022
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectAgronomy
cg.iitasubjectFood Security
cg.iitasubjectGrain Legumes
cg.iitasubjectPlant Breeding
cg.iitasubjectPlant Production
cg.iitasubjectSoil Fertility
cg.iitasubjectSoybean
cg.journalPLoS ONE
cg.notesOpen Access Article; Published online: 15 Sep 2022
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
cg.reviewstatusPeer Review
cg.usagerightslicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 0.0)
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272924
cg.iitaauthor.identifierAbush Tesfaye: 0000-0002-9245-360X
cg.futureupdate.requiredNo
cg.identifier.issue9
cg.identifier.volume17


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record