All stakeholders, especially households that depend on agriculture, must come up with every avenue available to improve farm productivity in order to raise yields due to the constraints posed by climate change on food production systems. Sufficient increments in yields will address the challenges of food insecurity and malnutrition among vulnerable households, especially smallholder ones. Yield increases can be achieved sustainably through the deployment of various Climate Smart Integrated Pest Management (CS-IPM) practices, including good agronomic practices. Therefore, CS-IPM practices could be essential in ensuring better household welfare, including food security and nutrition. With such impact empirically documented, appropriate policy guidance can be realized in favor of CS-IPM practices at scale, thus helping to achieve sustainable food security and food systems. However, to this end, there is yet limited evidence on the real impact of CS-IPM practices on the various core social welfare household parameters, for instance, food security, household incomes, gender roles, and nutrition, among others. We contribute to this body of literature in this paper by reviewing various empirical evidence that analyzes the impact of respective CS-IPM practices on key social welfare aspects of smallholder farm households in developing countries around the world. The review finds that CS-IPM practices do increase households’ adaptation to climate change, thus enhancing soil and crop productivity, thereby ensuring food and nutrition security, as well as increasing market participation of CS-IPM adopters, thus leading to increased household incomes, asset accumulation, and subsequently better household food and nutrition security via direct own-farm produce consumption and market purchases using income. CS-IPM practices also enhance access to climate-related information, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, conserve biodiversity, and enhance dietary diversity through improved crop and livestock varieties and also reduce variable farm production costs. Therefore, there would be multiple welfare gains if CS-IPM practices were scaled up.

https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11050097

Multi standard citation

APAHarvardMLAVancouverChicagoIEEE

HARUNA SEKABIRAhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5675-7211

Ghislain Tepa-Yottohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-8313

Manuele Tamòhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-7421

Tahirou Abdoulayehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8072-1363

https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11050097

Biotech and Plant Breeding; Plant Production and Health; Social Science and Agribusiness

Agribusiness; Climate Change; Food Security; Livelihoods; Nutrition; Plant Health; Smallholder Farmers

Climate Smart Agriculture; Integrated Pest Management; Households; Welfare; Food Security

West Africa; West Asia

Burkina Faso (Upper Volta); Iraq; Niger

Eastern Africa Hub; Central Africa Hub

Climate