Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTully, K.L.
dc.contributor.authorHickman, J.E.
dc.contributor.authorRusso, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorNeill, C.
dc.contributor.authorMatata, P.
dc.contributor.authorNyadzi, G.
dc.contributor.authorMutuo, P.
dc.contributor.authorPalm, C.A.
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-13T14:12:59Z
dc.date.available2023-10-13T14:12:59Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-09
dc.identifier.citationTully, K.L., Hickman, J.E., Russo, T.A., Neill, C., Matata, P., Nyadzi, G., ... & Palm, C.A. (2023). The fate of nitrogen during agricultural intensification in East Africa: nitrogen budgets in contrasting agroecosystems. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 128(7): e2022JG007128, 1-22.
dc.identifier.issn2169-8953
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/8280
dc.description.abstractThe intensification of agricultural systems in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is necessary to reduce poverty and improve food security, but increased nutrient applications in smallholder systems could have negative consequences for water quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and air quality. We tracked nitrogen (N) inputs and measured maize (Zea mays) biomass, grain yields, N leaching, and nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide fluxes from a clayey soil in Yala, Kenya and a sandy soil in Tumbi, Tanzania, with application rates of 0, 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 kg N ha−1 yr−1 over two cropping seasons. Maize yields were 4.5 times higher in Yala than Tumbi, but yields plateaued at both sites with fertilizer applications at or above 100 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Partial N budgets in Yala were typically negative, meaning more N was exported in maize biomass plus grain or lost from the system than was added in fertilizer. In Tumbi, N budgets were negative at lower fertilizer levels but positive at higher fertilizer levels. At both sites most (96%) of the N was lost through maize biomass/grain removal and N leaching. Fertilizer additions at or less than 50 kg N ha−1 yr−1 on these two contrasting sites resulted in minor gaseous N losses, and fertilizer additions less than 200 kg N ha−1 yr−1 caused relatively little change to N leaching losses. This indicates that the modest increases in fertilizer use required to improve maize yields will not greatly increase cropland N losses. Plain Language Summary Crop yields in smallholder agriculture across sub-Saharan Africa are low but could be increased by greater applications of nitrogen fertilizer. However, greater use of nitrogen fertilizer creates potential for higher emissions of nitrogen trace gases and nitrogen leaching losses. This study added nitrogen fertilizer doses (0, 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 kg of nitrogen per hectare) to maize cropland in two smallholder farming sites, one on clay-rich soils in Kenya and one on sandy soils in Tanzania. It tracked removal of nitrogen fertilizer via harvested maize and losses as nitrous oxide (a greenhouse gas), NO (an air pollutant), and leaching of soil solution. Yields were 4.5 times higher on the clayey soil; yields plateaued at nitrogen application above 100 kg per hectare. Leaching losses far exceeded gaseous losses at both sites: 96% of nitrogen was removed in harvested crops and soil solution. Nitrogen additions at or below 50 kg of nitrogen per hectare led to minor increases in gaseous nitrogen losses and additions less than 200 kg of nitrogen per hectare did not increase soil solution losses. This indicates that the modest increases in fertilizer use required to improve maize yields will not greatly increase cropland nitrogen losses.
dc.description.sponsorshipEarth Institute at Columbia University
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation
dc.description.sponsorshipBill & Melinda Gates Foundation
dc.format.extent1-22
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subjectIntensification
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africa
dc.subjectFood Security
dc.subjectSmallholders
dc.subjectFarmers
dc.subjectEast Africa
dc.titleThe fate of nitrogen during agricultural intensification in East Africa: nitrogen budgets in contrasting agroecosystems
dc.typeJournal Article
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Maryland
cg.contributor.affiliationColumbia University
cg.contributor.affiliationPennsylvania State University
cg.contributor.affiliationWoodwell Climate Research Center, USA
cg.contributor.affiliationAgricultural Research Institute, Tanzania
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Labour Organization
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Florida
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEast Africa
cg.coverage.countryKenya
cg.coverage.countryTanzania
cg.coverage.hubEastern Africa Hub
cg.identifier.bibtexciteidTULLY:2023
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.iitasubjectFood Security
cg.iitasubjectLivelihoods
cg.iitasubjectSmallholder Farmers
cg.journalJournal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
cg.notesOpen Access Article; Published online: 09 Jul 2023
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
cg.reviewstatusPeer Review
cg.usagerightslicenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 0.0)
cg.targetaudienceScientists
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2022jg007128
cg.iitaauthor.identifierPatick Mutuo: 0000-0002-9824-2504
cg.futureupdate.requiredNo
cg.identifier.issue7: e2022JG007128
cg.identifier.volume128


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record