• Contact Us
    • Send Feedback
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    Whole Repository
    CollectionsIssue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject
    This Sub-collection
    Issue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject

    My Account

    Login

    Welcome to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Research Repository

    What would you like to view today?

    Are farm input subsidies a disincentive for integrated pest management adoption? Evidence from Zambia

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Journal Article (1.459Mb)
    Date
    2024-04-23
    Author
    Tambo, J.A.
    Liverpool-Tasie, L.S.O.
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review Status
    Peer Review
    Target Audience
    Scientists
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Description
    Input subsidy programmes (ISPs) remain a popular but contentious policy tool to promote agricultural intensification, food security and poverty reduction across Africa. Although previous studies have explored the impact of ISPs on various smallholder outcomes, no studies have analysed the impact of recent ISPs on pest management. This is particularly important given the increasing pest challenges due to climate change and the recent surge in pesticide use in low-income countries and its associated negative consequences for human and environmental health. Thus, this study assessed the effects of ISPs on smallholder adoption of sustainable pest management practices, using data from 1048 smallholder maize plots across major maize-producing zones of Zambia and a control function regression approach. We find consistent evidence that input subsidy receipt is negatively associated with smallholders' adoption of environmentally friendly and sustainable pest management strategies. Participation in the Zambia ISP (particularly the flexible e-voucher system) encourages synthetic pesticide use, at the expense of sustainable practices. We also find that farmers consider synthetic pesticides and biopesticides as substitutes and are more likely to adopt sustainable pest management when they have tenure security and access to financial resources. Given the human and environmental health consequences associated with synthetic pesticide use, it would be important to leverage input subsidy schemes to promote the adoption of safer and more sustainable alternatives to synthetic pesticides. Beyond input subsidies, policies that improve tenure security and financial access for smallholders can promote the adoption of sustainable pest management practices.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12582
    Multi standard citation
    Permanent link to this item
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/8490
    IITA Authors ORCID
    Lenis Liverpool-Tasiehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-5888
    Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12582
    Research Themes
    Plant Production and Health
    IITA Subjects
    Disease Control; Food Security; Maize; Pests of Plants; Plant Breeding; Plant Production
    Agrovoc Terms
    Fall Armywarm; Integrated Pest Management; Food Security; Pesticides; Smallholder Farmers; Zambia
    Regions
    Africa; Southern Africa
    Countries
    Zambia
    Hubs
    Headquarters and Western Africa Hub
    Journals
    Journal of Agricultural Economics
    Collections
    • Journal and Journal Articles5286
    copyright © 2019  IITASpace. All rights reserved.
    IITA | Open Access Repository