• Contact Us
    • Send Feedback
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    Whole Repository
    CollectionsIssue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject
    This Sub-collection
    Issue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject

    My Account

    Login

    Welcome to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Research Repository

    What would you like to view today?

    Conservation agriculture practices: adaptation and yield

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Rusinamhodzi, L .
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review Status
    Peer Review
    Target Audience
    Scientists
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Description
    Conservation agriculture (CA) has been promoted in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to increase crop productivity and for climate change adaptation. CA is the simultaneous application of the three principles: no-till, mulch cover, and crop diversification. The potential benefits are largely linked to moisture conservation of crop residues, reduced run-off and erosion, increased infiltration, and reduced evaporative losses. This study uses a review of recent literature in SSA under rain-fed conditions to synthesize evidence of the effect of CA on yield and climate change adaptation. Web of Science and Google Scholar were used for literature searches. Crop productivity results in the literature suggest that CA increases yield in certain circumstances such as well-drained soils and moderate rainfall, and that poorly drained soils in combination with excessive rains lead to depressed yields. The yield benefits reported range from as low as 4% and as high as 16%, with negative effects also reported. Stability analysis used as a proxy for adaptation revealed only a marginal benefit of CA above conventional practices suggesting the significant effect of seasonal rainfall on crop productivity. The results suggest the need to target CA practices to different agroecologies and other pragmatic local agronomic practices that may be required in cases of excessive rainfall and extended mid-season dry spells. The benefits of CA reported are largely plot level, and only a few studies consider the whole farm, especially within the holistic livelihood framework. In addition, adoption of CA remains low among smallholder farmers, and the widespread benefits of the practices cannot be realized at multiple scales.
    https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2024.0034
    Multi standard citation
    Permanent link to this item
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/8540
    Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
    https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2024.0034
    IITA Subjects
    Agribusiness; Agronomy; Climate Change; Farming Systems; Food Security; Smallholder Farmers
    Agrovoc Terms
    Conservation Agriculture; Climate Change Adaptation; Farming Systems; Food Security; Smallholder Farmers
    Regions
    Africa; Africa South of Sahara; West Africa
    Hubs
    Headquarters and Western Africa Hub
    Journals
    CABI Reviews
    Collections
    • Journal and Journal Articles5286
    copyright © 2019  IITASpace. All rights reserved.
    IITA | Open Access Repository