• Contact Us
    • Send Feedback
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    Whole Repository
    CollectionsIssue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject
    This Sub-collection
    Issue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject

    My Account

    Login

    Welcome to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Research Repository

    What would you like to view today?

    Weeding force saving to improve profitability of cassava-legumes cropping systems in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Journal Article (11.60Mb)
    Date
    2025-01
    Author
    Muke, A.
    Nabahungu, N.L.
    Kokou, K.
    Vanlauwe, B.
    Boeckx, P.
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review Status
    Peer Review
    Target Audience
    Scientists
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Description
    Weeding is a common farming practice for optimal emergence, growth and maturity of crops. Smallholders in Central Africa use a traditional hoe for weed control. This is a hard and time-consuming activity. To address this bottleneck, a study was conducted at three sites, namely Walungu, Uvira, and Mulungu in South-Kivu in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), over two growing seasons (September 2020 and February 2021). The purpose was to minimize the workload involved in weed control and boosting cassava yields via time-, labour, and energy-saving through adjusted weeding. Experiments were carried out as a split-plot design with three randomized blocks at multiple locations. Weed control was assessed for hand hoe, herbicide, and single-wheeled hoe (a weeding tool that combines manpower with improved weeding precision) in a cassava-legume intercropping system. Results show that the use of herbicide translated into about 6 times less energy use than a hand hoe, accounting for a ca. 4 times reduced weeding workload, and a reduction in weeding time up to 84%. The single-wheeled hoe use accounted for almost 61% reduction in weeding energy consumed, a reduction of 40% of the weeding time, and for about 38% of the weeding load saving. Although the three weeding methods gave statistically similar yields, it nevertheless turned out that herbicide treatment achieved the lowest cost-benefit ratio (CBR) (0.2), evoking its superiority in terms of profitability over both the hand hoe and the single-wheeled hoe. The study asserted that weed control is ‘moderately heavy’ and ‘light’ when involving the single-wheeled hoe and herbicide, respectively.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106958
    Multi standard citation
    Permanent link to this item
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/8621
    IITA Authors ORCID
    Nsharwasi Nabahunguhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-3777
    bernard vanlauwehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6016-6027
    Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106958
    Research Themes
    Natural Resource Management
    IITA Subjects
    Agronomy; Cassava; Farming Systems; Food Security; Plant Breeding; Plant Production; Weeds
    Agrovoc Terms
    Weed Control; Cassava; Legumes; Intercropping; Labour Productivity; Herbicides
    Regions
    Africa; Central Africa
    Countries
    Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Hubs
    Eastern Africa Hub; Headquarters and Western Africa Hub
    Journals
    Crop Protection
    Collections
    • Journal and Journal Articles5286
    copyright © 2019  IITASpace. All rights reserved.
    IITA | Open Access Repository