Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAgunbiade, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorCoates, B.S.
dc.contributor.authorDatinon, B.
dc.contributor.authorDjouaka, R.F.
dc.contributor.authorSun, W.
dc.contributor.authorTamo, M.
dc.contributor.authorPittendrigh, Barry R.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T10:58:27Z
dc.date.available2019-12-04T10:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2014-03
dc.identifier.citationAgunbiade, T.A., Coates, B.S., Datinon, B., Djouaka, R.F., Sun, W., Tamo, M. & Pittendrigh, B.R. (2014). Genetic differentiation among Maruca vitrata F.(Lepidoptera: Crambidae) populations on cultivated cowpea and wild host plants: implications for insect resistance management and biological control strategies. PloS one, 9(3), e92072.
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/993
dc.description.abstractMaruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is a polyphagous insect pest that feeds on a variety of leguminous plantsin the tropics and subtropics. The contribution of host-associated genetic variation on population structure wasinvestigated using analysis of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (cox1) sequence and microsatellite marker data from M.vitrata collected from cultivated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.), and alternative host plants Pueraria phaseoloides(Roxb.) Benth. var. javanica (Benth.) Baker, Loncocarpus sericeus (Poir), and Tephrosia candida (Roxb.). Analyses ofmicrosatellite data revealed a significant global FST estimate of 0.05 (P#0.001). The program STRUCTURE estimated 2genotypic clusters (co-ancestries) on the four host plants across 3 geographic locations, but little geographic variation waspredicted among genotypes from different geographic locations using analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; amonggroup variation 20.68%) or F-statistics (FSTLoc =20.01; P = 0.62). These results were corroborated by mitochondrialhaplotype data (QSTLoc = 0.05; P = 0.92). In contrast, genotypes obtained from different host plants showed low butsignificant levels of genetic variation (FSTHost = 0.04; P = 0.01), which accounted for 4.08% of the total genetic variation, butwas not congruent with mitochondrial haplotype analyses (QSTHost = 0.06; P = 0.27). Variation among host plants at a locationand host plants among locations showed no consistent evidence for M. vitrata population subdivision. These resultssuggest that host plants do not significantly influence the genetic structure of M. vitrata, and this has implications forbiocontrol agent releases as well as insecticide resistance management (IRM) for M. vitrata in West Africa.Ci
dc.format.extente92072
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectMaruca Vitrate
dc.subjectCowpeas
dc.subjectBiological Control
dc.subjectHost Plants
dc.subjectInsect Control
dc.titleGenetic Differentiation among Maruca vitrata F. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Populations on Cultivated Cowpea and Wild Host Plants: Implications for Insect Resistance Management and Biological Control Strategies
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.versionPeer Review
cg.contributor.crpGrain Legumes
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Illinois
cg.contributor.affiliationUnited States Department of Agriculture
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionWest Africa
cg.coverage.countryBenin
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research institute
cg.iitasubjectPests Of Plants
cg.journal PloS one
cg.howpublishedFormally Published
cg.accessibilitystatusOpen Access
local.dspaceid77922
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092072


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record