Welcome to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Research Repository
What would you like to view today?
Insecticide contamination in organic agriculture: evidence from a long-term farming systems comparisons trial
View/ Open
Date
2024-03Author
Kampermann, I.
Bautze, D.
Mapili, M.
Musyoka, M.W.
Karanja, E.
Fiaboe, K.
Irungu, J.
Adamtey, N.
Type
Review Status
Peer ReviewTarget Audience
Scientists
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract/Description
Synthetic pesticides applied in conventional agriculture to control pests tend to compromise ecosystem services, and their residues may contaminate organic agriculture. To understand the significance of this contamination, also in small-scale farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa, quantitative data is required. Therefore, we compared synthetic insecticide and botanical/biopesticide residues in conventional and organic agricultural production systems after nine years of continuous cultivation of a maize-based crop rotation system at two sites in Kenya. Our results show high detectable concentrations of synthetic insecticide residues (imidacloprid, acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos, and chlorantraniliprole) in conventional plant produce and soil. Furthermore, the organophosphate chlorpyrifos was detected at concentrations above European Union Maximum Residue Limits (MRL) for plant produce, indicating potential risks for human health. Additionally, we detected imidacloprid, acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos, and chlorantraniliprole concentrations in the soil, indicating potential environmental harm. No residues of biopesticide/botanicals were detected in any of the production systems. However, we detected imidacloprid and chlorantraniliprole in organic plots. The findings indicate that the MRLs can be crossed even if synthetic insecticides are applied according to or below the recommended rates on the conventional plots. Thus, synthetic insecticides potentially risk human health and the environment, while botanicals and bio-pesticides represent a safe alternative.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from the Biovision Foundation for Ecological Development, Coop Sustainability Fund, the Liechtenstein Development Service (LED), and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). They also wish to thank the management of the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) for offering the trial site at Thika and the management of Kiereini Primary School for offering the second trial site at Chuka. In addition, we want ...
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106529
Multi standard citation
Permanent link to this item
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/8423IITA Authors ORCID
Komi Fiaboehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5113-2159
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106529