• Contact Us
    • Send Feedback
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • Journal and Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    Whole Repository
    CollectionsIssue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject
    This Sub-collection
    Issue DateRegionCountryHubAffiliationAuthorsTitlesSubject

    My Account

    Login

    Welcome to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Research Repository

    What would you like to view today?

    Assessing the speed of improved postharvest technology adoption in Tanzania: The role of social learning and agricultural extension services

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Journal Article (959.8Kb)
    Date
    2024-03-12
    Author
    Manda, J.
    Feleke, S.
    Mutungi, C.
    Tufa, A.H.
    Mateete, B.
    Abdoulaye, T.
    Alene, A.D.
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review Status
    Peer Review
    Target Audience
    Scientists
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract/Description
    The Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) bag is often associated with preventing grain damage from insect infestation, reducing aflatoxin accumulation in stored grain, and avoiding exposure to hazardous storage chemicals. However, limited knowledge is available on the information channels driving the adoption of the technology. Using data from 429 households, this study examines the impacts of social learning and extension services on the speed of adoption of PICS bags in Tanzania. We utilized the doubly robust multivalued inverse probability weighted regression (MIPWRA) model to estimate the impact and the Laplace regression model to evaluate the heterogeneous effects of the two information channels. The impact results indicate that social learning and extension services reduce the time to adopt PICS bags by 51 % and 49 %, respectively. Moreover, the speed at which farmers adopted the technology was faster when using the two information channels jointly (61 %) than individually. The Laplace regression model results show that the marginal impacts of the two channels are higher for the households in the upper quantiles of the distribution, compared to the lower quantiles representing the early adopters. Designing policies that account for different adopter groups (innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards) is therefore essential.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123306
    Multi standard citation
    Permanent link to this item
    https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12478/8467
    IITA Authors ORCID
    Julius Mandahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-5906
    Shiferaw Felekehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0759-4070
    Christopher Mutungihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-1569
    Adane Tufahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-6526
    Mateete Bekundahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7297-9383
    Tahirou Abdoulayehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8072-1363
    Arega Alenehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2491-4603
    Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123306
    Research Themes
    Natural Resource Management; Social Science and Agribusiness
    IITA Subjects
    Agronomy; Food Security; Maize; Natural Resource Management
    Agrovoc Terms
    postharvest technology; Social learning; Tanzania
    Regions
    East Africa
    Countries
    Tanzania
    Hubs
    Southern Africa Hub; Eastern Africa Hub; Headquarters and Western Africa Hub
    Journals
    Technological Forecasting & Social Change
    Collections
    • Journal and Journal Articles5286
    copyright © 2019  IITASpace. All rights reserved.
    IITA | Open Access Repository